Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31771221›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2019

Safety and Effectiveness of Shoulder Arthroplasties in Spain: A Systematic Review.

Jorge Arias-de la Torre, Xavier Garcia, Kayla Smith, Arantxa Romero-Tamarit, Elisa Puigdomenech, Laura Muñoz-Ortiz, Jonathan P Evans, Vicente Martín, Antonio J Molina, Carles Torrens and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jorge Arias-de la TorreKing's College London. Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), SE5 8AB London, UK.
Xavier GarciaAgency for Health Quality and Assessment of Catalonia (AQuAS), 08005 Barcelona, Spain.
Kayla SmithAgency for Health Quality and Assessment of Catalonia (AQuAS), 08005 Barcelona, Spain.
Arantxa Romero-TamaritAgency for Health Quality and Assessment of Catalonia (AQuAS), 08005 Barcelona, Spain.
Elisa PuigdomenechAgency for Health Quality and Assessment of Catalonia (AQuAS), 08005 Barcelona, Spain.
Laura Muñoz-OrtizAgency for Health Quality and Assessment of Catalonia (AQuAS), 08005 Barcelona, Spain.
Jonathan P EvansHealth Services and Policy Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, EX1 2LU Exeter, UK.
Vicente MartínCIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Antonio J MolinaInstitute of Biomedicine (IBIOMED), University of Leon, 24071 León, Spain.
Carles TorrensHospital del Mar, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Trauma, 08003 Barcelona, Spain.
Miquel Pons-CabrafigaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Trauma, Sant Rafael University Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
Francesc PallisóDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Trauma, Santa María University Hospital, 25198 Lleida, Spain.
Jose María ValderasHealth Services and Policy Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, EX1 2LU Exeter, UK.
Mireia EspallarguesAgency for Health Quality and Assessment of Catalonia (AQuAS), 08005 Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III AQuAS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effectiveness and safety of shoulder arthroplasties in the general context of a Spanish patient population remains unclear. The aim of this study was to ascertain both the effectiveness and safety of primary shoulder arthroplasties and the prosthesis types used in Spain. A systematic review of all the available literature evaluating the effectiveness and safety of primary shoulder arthroplasties in Spain was performed. A narrative synthesis was performed, and evidence tables were created in four dimensions: study design, arthroplasty characteristics, safety, and effectiveness. Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel (ODEP) scores were used to evaluate prosthesis types. Twenty-one studies were selected that included a total of 1293 arthroplasties. The most common indication was fractures, while the prosthesis most frequently used was the Delta Xtend (ODEP 10A). The most common complication was scapular notching. Prosthesis revision rate was approximately 6% for follow-ups between 12 and 79 months. In addition, significant improvements were observed in the Constant-Murley test score after the intervention. Currently in Spain, shoulder arthroplasty can be considered a safe and effective procedure with functional recovery and pain reduction for eligible patients with humeral fracture, rotator cuff arthropathy, fracture sequelae and malunion of the proximal humerus, and degenerative disease. Future longitudinal research and population-based studies could serve to confirm these results and identify points of improvement.

Indexed as

arthroplastyeffectivenesssafetyshouldersystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31771221
PMCPMC6947222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.