Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31770979›Full record

ArticlePhysical review. E2019

Backbone reconstruction in temporal networks from epidemic data.

Francesco Vincenzo Surano, Christian Bongiorno, Lorenzo Zino, Maurizio Porfiri, Alessandro Rizzo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical review. E, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Francesco Vincenzo SuranoDepartment of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy.
Christian BongiornoDepartment of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy.
Lorenzo ZinoDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, New York University Tandon School of Engineering, Brooklyn, New York 11201, USA.
Maurizio PorfiriDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, New York University Tandon School of Engineering, Brooklyn, New York 11201, USA.
Alessandro RizzoDepartment of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy.
Politecnico di Torino · ITNew York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many complex systems are characterized by time-varying patterns of interactions. These interactions comprise strong ties, driven by dyadic relationships, and weak ties, based on node-specific attributes. The interplay between strong and weak ties plays an important role on dynamical processes that could unfold on complex systems. However, seldom do we have access to precise information about the time-varying topology of interaction patterns. A particularly elusive question is to distinguish strong from weak ties, on the basis of the sole node dynamics. Building upon analytical results, we propose a statistically-principled algorithm to reconstruct the backbone of strong ties from data of a spreading process, consisting of the time series of individuals' states. Our method is numerically validated over a range of synthetic datasets, encapsulating salient features of real-world systems. Motivated by compelling evidence, we propose the integration of our algorithm in a targeted immunization strategy that prioritizes influential nodes in the inferred backbone. Through Monte Carlo simulations on synthetic networks and a real-world case study, we demonstrate the viability of our approach.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAlgorithmsDisease SusceptibilityEpidemicsHumansInfectionsMonte Carlo MethodTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID31770979
PMCPMC7217498
OpenAlexW2981202088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.