ArticlePhysical review. E2019
Thermodynamically consistent treatment of the growth of a biopolymer in the presence of a smooth obstacle interaction potential.
Article in Physical review. E, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- On multistability and constitutive relations of cell motion on fibronectin lanes.Biophysical journal · 2023Article
- Undulation of a moving fluid membrane pushed by filament growth.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- On the adhesion-velocity relation and length adaptation of motile cells on stepped fibronectin lanes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We investigate the effect of filament-obstacle interactions on the force-velocity relation of growing biopolymers, via calculations explicitly treating obstacle diffusion and stochastic addition and subtraction of subunits. We first show that the instantaneous subunit on- and off-rates satisfy a rigorous thermodynamic relationship determined by the filament-obstacle interaction potential, which has been violated by several calculations in the literature. The instantaneous rates depend not only on the average force on the obstacle but also on the shape of the potential on the nanometer length scale. Basing obstacle-induced reduction of the on-rate entirely on the force, as previous work has often done, is thermodynamically inconsistent and can overestimate the stall force, sometimes by more than a factor of two. We perform simulations and analytic calculations of the force-velocity relation satisfying the thermodynamic relationship. The force-velocity relation can deviate strongly from the Brownian-Ratchet predictions. For shallow potential wells of depth ∼5k_{B}T, which might correspond to transient filament-membrane attachments, the velocity drops more rapidly than predicted by the Brownian-Ratchet model, in some cases by as much as a factor of 50 at an opposing force of only 1 pN. On the other hand, the zero-force velocity is much less affected than would be expected from naive use of the Boltzmann factor. Furthermore, the growth velocity has a surprisingly strong dependence on the obstacle diffusion coefficient even when the dimensionless diffusion coefficient is large. For deep potential wells, as might result from strong filament-membrane links, both the on- and off-rates are reduced significantly, slowing polymerization. Such potentials can sustain pulling forces while polymerizing but only if the attractive well is relatively flat over a region comparable to or greater than the monomer size. For double-well potentials, which have such a flat region, the slowing of polymerization by external pushing force is almost linear up to the stall force in some parameter ranges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.