Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31770769›Full record

ReviewDigestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Use of Evidence-Based Herbal Medicines for Patients with Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: A Conceptional Framework for Risk-Benefit Assessment and Regulatory Approaches.

Gerald Holtmann, Dietmar Schrenk, Ahmed Madisch, Hans D Allescher, Gudrun Ulrich-Merzenich, Fermin Mearin, Dominique Larrey, Peter Malfertheiner

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Double-blind, randomized, 8-week multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of STW 5-IIJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Involvement of NO/cGMP Signaling Pathway, CaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Gerald HoltmannDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia, g.holtmann@uq.edu.au.
Dietmar SchrenkDepartment of Food Chemistry and Toxicology, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Ahmed MadischKRH Klinikum Siloah, Hannover, Germany.
Hans D AllescherKlinikum Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Munich, Germany.
Gudrun Ulrich-MerzenichMedical Clinic III, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Fermin MearinServicio Aparato Digestivo, Centro Médico Teknon, C/Vilana s/n, Barcelona, Spain.
Dominique LarreyHépatogastroentérologie Hopital, Montpellier, France.
Peter MalfertheinerLMU Klinikum der Universität, Medizinische Klinik II, Munich, Germany.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier · FRGarmisch-Partenkirchen Medical Center · DEHospital Quirón Teknon · ESKlinikum Region Hannover · DELMU Klinikum · DEQueensland University of Technology · AUUniversity of Bonn · DEUniversity of Kaiserslautern · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHerbal or complementary medicines are frequently used for the treatment of patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID). Regulatory requirements for herbal therapies are inconsistent and, in many jurisdictions, herbal therapies are either self-, minimally- or unregulated.

aimTo provide guidance for the appropriate and safe use of herbal medicines in patients with FGID patients with special consideration of the regulatory frameworks.

methodsA PubMed search of the literature was performed; relevant articles were included.

resultsSimilar to chemically defined therapies herbal medicines can cause adverse events. Thus, a risk-benefit appraisal should be undertaken for these therapies. While there is no disease specific mortality in FGID patients, patients with FGID who fail to respond to "empiric" chemically defined therapies undergo diagnostic and therapeutic measures that can be associated with appreciable morbidity and mortality. Thus, effective herbal treatments that subsequently reduce health-care utilization, reduce risks related to diagnostic or therapeutic measures that are initiated if no improvement of symptoms occurs. This "protective" effect of effective treatments for FGID needs to be taken in consideration when the risks and benefits of treatments are determined. In addition, standards that mirror regulations for chemically defined treatments should apply and the components of the respective preparations should undergo ongoing toxicological testing and rigorous quality assurance measures (including pharmacovigilance) applied.

conclusionsSome herbal therapies offer significant benefits for patients with FGID. To ensure the safety of these treatments, the regulatory requirements should mirror requirements for chemically defined treatments.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicinePhytotherapyRisk AssessmentSocial Control, FormalGastrointestinal DiseasesHumansTreatment OutcomeFunctional gastrointestinal disordersHerbal therapiesRegistrationRisk-benefit-analysis

Identifiers

PMID31770769
PMCPMC7384339
OpenAlexW2990481170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.