ArticleCognition2020
Reward learning biases the direction of saccades.
Article in Cognition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The Attention Habit II: How selection history shapes the strategic control of attention.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025Review
- Two Distinct Attentional Priorities Guide Exploratory and Exploitative Gaze in Parallel.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Task-relevant information availability shapes eye movements and perceptual judgment confidence.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Reward history modulates visual attention in an avian model.Animal cognition · 2023Article
- Neural correlates of value-driven spatial orienting.Psychophysiology · 2023Article
- Pavlovian learning in the selection history-dependent control of overt spatial attention.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2022Article
- Gotcha: Working memory prioritization from automatic attentional biases.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2022Review
- An adaptive view of attentional control.The American psychologist · 2021Review
- The past, present, and future of selection history.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021Review
- Using aversive conditioning with near-real-time feedback to shape eye movements during naturalistic viewing.Behavior research methods · 2021Article
- Inertia in value-driven attention.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2020Article
- Selection history is relative.Vision research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The role of associative reward learning in guiding feature-based attention and spatial attention is well established. However, no studies have looked at the extent to which reward learning can modulate the direction of saccades during visual search. Here, we introduced a novel reward learning paradigm to examine whether reward-associated directions of eye movements can modulate performance in different visual search tasks. Participants had to fixate a peripheral target before fixating one of four disks that subsequently appeared in each cardinal position. This was followed by reward feedback contingent upon the direction chosen, where one direction consistently yielded a high reward. Thus, reward was tied to the direction of saccades rather than the absolute location of the stimulus fixated. Participants selected the target in the high-value direction on the majority of trials, demonstrating robust learning of the task contingencies. In an untimed visual foraging task that followed, which was performed in extinction, initial saccades were reliably biased in the previously rewarded-associated direction. In a second experiment, following the same training procedure, eye movements in the previously high-value direction were facilitated in a saccade-to-target task. Our findings suggest that rewarding directional eye movements biases oculomotor search patterns in a manner that is robust to extinction and generalizes across stimuli and task.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.