Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31770367›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2019

Comparative analysis of small RNAs released by the filarial nematode Litomosoides sigmodontis in vitro and in vivo.

Juan F Quintana, Sujai Kumar, Alasdair Ivens, Franklin W N Chow, Anna M Hoy, Alison Fulton, Paul Dickinson, Coralie Martin, Matthew Taylor, Simon A Babayan and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. MicroRNAs: Harbingers and shapers of periodontal inflammation.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Secretory microRNA Profiles of Third- and Fourth-StagePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Role ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Juan F QuintanaInstitute of Immunology and Infection Research and Centre for Immunity, Infection & Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5092-5576
Sujai KumarInstitute of Immunology and Infection Research and Centre for Immunity, Infection & Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Alasdair IvensInstitute of Immunology and Infection Research and Centre for Immunity, Infection & Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Franklin W N ChowInstitute of Immunology and Infection Research and Centre for Immunity, Infection & Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1275-2464
Anna M HoyInstitute of Immunology and Infection Research and Centre for Immunity, Infection & Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Alison FultonInstitute of Immunology and Infection Research and Centre for Immunity, Infection & Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Paul DickinsonInstitute of Immunology and Infection Research and Centre for Immunity, Infection & Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2386-2810
Coralie MartinUnite Molecules de Communication et Adaptation des Microorganismes (MCAM, UMR 7245), Sorbonne Universites, Museum national d'Histoire naturelle, CNRS, CP52, Paris, France.
Matthew TaylorInstitute of Immunology and Infection Research and Centre for Immunity, Infection & Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Simon A BabayanInstitute of Biodiversity Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4949-1117
Amy H BuckInstitute of Immunology and Infection Research and Centre for Immunity, Infection & Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2645-7191
Centre for Immunity, Infection and Evolution · GBCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council MR/K020196/1Medical Research Council R42229Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 201083/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe release of small non-coding RNAs (sRNAs) has been reported in parasitic nematodes, trematodes and cestodes of medical and veterinary importance. However, little is known regarding the diversity and composition of sRNAs released by different lifecycle stages and the portion of sRNAs that persist in host tissues during filarial infection. This information is relevant to understanding potential roles of sRNAs in parasite-to-host communication, as well as to inform on the location within the host and time point at which they can be detected. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL

findingsWe have used small RNA (sRNA) sequencing analysis to identify sRNAs in replicate samples of the excretory-secretory (ES) products of developmental stages of the filarial nematode Litomosoides sigmodontis in vitro and compare this to the parasite-derived sRNA detected in host tissues. We show that all L. sigmodontis developmental stages release RNAs in vitro, including ribosomal RNA fragments, 5'-derived tRNA fragments (5'-tRFs) and, to a lesser extent, microRNAs (miRNAs). The gravid adult females (gAF) produce the largest diversity and abundance of miRNAs in the ES compared to the adult males or microfilariae. Analysis of sRNAs detected in serum and macrophages from infected animals reveals that parasite miRNAs are preferentially detected in vivo, compared to their low levels in the ES products, and identifies miR-92-3p and miR-71-5p as L. sigmodontis miRNAs that are stably detected in host cells in vivo.

conclusionsOur results suggest that gravid adult female worms secrete the largest diversity of extracellular sRNAs compared to adult males or microfilariae. We further show differences in the parasite sRNA biotype distribution detected in vitro versus in vivo. We identify macrophages as one reservoir for parasite sRNA during infection, and confirm the presence of parasite miRNAs and tRNAs in host serum during patent infection.

Indexed as

AnimalsBody FluidsFemaleFilariasisFilarioideaHost-Parasite InteractionsLife Cycle StagesMacrophagesMaleMiceMicrofilariaeMicroRNAsRNA, RibosomalRNA, Small UntranslatedRNA, TransferSequence AnalysisMicroRNAsRNA, RibosomalRNA, Small UntranslatedRNA, Transfer

Identifiers

PMID31770367
PMCPMC6903752
OpenAlexW2981816952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.