Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31770365›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2019

The great hairball gambit.

Jonathan Flint, Trey Ideker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Contributions of mutation and selection to regulatory variation: lessons from thePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Human height: a model common complex trait.Annals of human biology · 2023
    Review
  8. New insights from the last decade of research in psychiatric genetics: discoveries, challenges and clinical implications.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Folk Classification and Factor Rotations: Whales, Sharks, and the Problems With the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP).Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Statistical mechanics meets single-cell biology.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jonathan FlintDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Trey IdekerDivision of Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1708-8454

Funding

Sequencing CoreP50DA037844 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI PALMER, ABRAHAM A · 2014 to 2023
$27.4M
The Psychiatric Cell Map Initiative: Connecting Genomics, Subcellular Networks, and Higher Order PhenotypesU01MH115747 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KAMPMANN, MARTIN, KROGAN, NEVAN J · 2018 to 2022
$19.6M
Developing a Pathway from Genetic Locus to Gene for Complex Traits in RodentsR01MH115979 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI FLINT, JONATHAN · 2018 to 2022
$3.5M
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA037844NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH115979NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH115747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyGenetic LociHumansMetabolic Networks and PathwaysProtein Interaction Maps

Identifiers

PMID31770365
PMCPMC6910700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.