ArticleMedicine2019
Efficacy of low molecular weight heparin for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and respiratory failure: A protocol of systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computer Added Simulation of the Spread of Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria in an Radiation Therapy Shelter Based on Computational Fluid Dynamics.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvaluating the efficacy and safety of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and respiratory failure (RF) is a major purpose of this study.
methodsThe following electronic databases will be comprehensively retrieved from the inception to July 1, 2019: Cochrane Library, PUBMED, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, WANGFANG, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure without language restrictions. All randomized controlled trials related to LMWH for COPD and RF will be included. Two authors will carry out study selection, data collection, and risk of bias assessment independently.
resultsThis study will systematically explore the efficacy and safety of LMWH for COPD and RF. The primary outcome is lung function. The secondary outcomes are severity of dyspnea on exertion, quality of life, body mass index, airflow obstruction; and any expected and unexpected adverse events.
conclusionThe findings of this study will provide evidence to judge whether LMWH is an effective treatment for patients with COPD and RF. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42019 139631.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.