Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31770051›Full record

Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2020

Comparison of immunogenicity between intradermal and intramuscular injections of repeated annual identical influenza virus strains post-pandemic (2011-2012) in COPD patients.

Benjamas Chuaychoo, Uraiwan Kositanont, Parichat Niyomthong, Nuttapol Rittayamai, Sorachai Srisuma, Kanokwan Rattanasaengloet, Walaiporn Wongsrisakunkaew, Julalux Thongam, Thaweesak Songserm

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Benjamas ChuaychooDivision of Respiratory Disease and Tuberculosis, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital , Bangkok, Thailand.
Uraiwan KositanontDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital , Bangkok, Thailand.
Parichat NiyomthongDivision of Respiratory Disease and Tuberculosis, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital , Bangkok, Thailand.
Nuttapol RittayamaiDivision of Respiratory Disease and Tuberculosis, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital , Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-6844-6314
Sorachai SrisumaDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University , Bangkok, Thailand.
Kanokwan RattanasaengloetDivision of Respiratory Disease and Tuberculosis, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital , Bangkok, Thailand.
Walaiporn WongsrisakunkaewDivision of Respiratory Disease and Tuberculosis, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital , Bangkok, Thailand.
Julalux ThongamDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University , Bangkok, Thailand.
Thaweesak SongsermDepartment of Veterinary Pathology, Kamphaeng Saen, Kasetsart University , Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compared the antibody responses and persistence of the reduced-dose, 9 µg hemagglutinin (HA)/strain intradermal (ID) injection via the Mantoux technique and the 15 μg HA/strain intramuscular (IM) injection of the repeated annual identical trivalent, inactivated, split-virion vaccine 2011-2012 in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Eighty patients were randomized to ID (n = 41) and IM (n = 39) groups. Four weeks post-vaccination, the antibody responses of the two groups were similar; those for influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and influenza A(H3N2)-but not influenza B-met the criteria of the Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP). The antibody responses for influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 rapidly declined in both groups, especially with the ID injection, whereas those for influenza A(H3N2) maintained above the CPMP criteria throughout 12 months post-vaccination. The geometric mean titres for influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 persisted above the protective threshold (≥ 40) until 6 months post-vaccination in both the ID and IM groups. The seroprotection rates of the ID and IM groups were above 60% until 3 months and 6 months post-vaccination, respectively. In conclusion, the 9 μg HA/strain ID injection of vaccine 2011-2012 elicited antibody responses similar to the standard dose of 15 μg of the HA/strain IM injection at 4 weeks post-vaccination. However, the antibody responses for influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 rapidly declined, especially in the case of the ID injection, whereas they were comparable for influenza A(H3N2). Additional strategies for increasing vaccine durability should be considered, especially for new pandemic strains affecting elderly COPD patients.

Indexed as

Influenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAgedAntibodies, ViralHemagglutination Inhibition TestsHumansInfluenza A Virus, H3N2 SubtypeInjections, IntradermalInjections, IntramuscularAntibodies, ViralInfluenza Vaccinesantibody persistenceCOPDimmunogenicityinfluenza A(H1N1)pdm09Influenza vaccineintradermalrepeated identical vaccine

Identifiers

PMID31770051
PMCPMC7482887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.