Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31770048›Full record

Observational studyJournal of global oncology2019

To Tell or Not to Tell: Exploring the Preferences and Attitudes of Patients and Family Caregivers on Disclosure of a Cancer-Related Diagnosis and Prognosis.

Arunangshu Ghoshal, Naveen Salins, Anuja Damani, Jayeeta Chowdhury, Arundhati Chitre, Mary Ann Muckaden, Jayita Deodhar, Rajendra Badwe

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of global oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Psychological Support for Cancer Patients.Cancer treatment and research · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Influencing factors of depressive symptoms in patients with malignant tumour.The Journal of international medical research · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Arunangshu GhoshalTata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Naveen SalinsKasturba Medical College, Manipal, India.
Anuja DamaniTata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Jayeeta ChowdhuryIndia Health Fund, Tata Trusts, Mumbai, India.
Arundhati ChitreRamniranjan Jhunjhunwala College of Arts, Science, and Commerce, Mumbai, India.
Mary Ann MuckadenTata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Jayita DeodharTata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Rajendra BadweTata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo understand the preferences and attitudes of patients and family caregivers on disclosure of cancer diagnosis and prognosis in an Indian setting.

methodsOverall, 250 adult patients with cancer and 250 family caregivers attending the outpatients of a tertiary cancer hospital for the first time were recruited purposively. The mean ages of patients and caregivers were 49.9 years (range, 23-80 years) and 37.9 years (range, 19-67 years), respectively. Separately, they completed prevalidated, close-ended preference questions and were interviewed for open-ended attitude questions.

resultsA total of 250 adult patients (response rate, 47.17% overall, 73.2% in men, and 26.8% in women) and 250 family caregivers (response rate, 40.65% overall, 84.0% in men, and 16.0% in women) participated. Significant differences were observed in the preference to full disclosure of the name of illness between patients (81.2%) and caregivers (34.0%) and with the expected length of survival between patients (72.8%) and caregivers (8.8%;

conclusionPatients with cancer preferred full disclosure of their diagnoses and prognoses, whereas the family caregivers preferred nondisclosure of the same to their patients. This novel information obtained through a large study with varied participants from different parts of the country will help formulate communication strategies for cancer care.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthTruth DisclosureAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversCommunicationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPrognosisYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31770048
PMCPMC6882506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.