Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31769903›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical practice2020

Evaluation of provider documentation patterns as a tool to deliver ongoing patient-centred diabetes education and support.

Qing Ye, Richa Patel, Uzma Khan, Suzanne Austin Boren, Min Soon Kim

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Telehealth Technologies in Diabetes Self-management and Education.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qing YeUniversity of Missouri Informatics Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5442-1714
Richa PatelDepartment of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Uzma KhanDepartment of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Suzanne Austin BorenUniversity of Missouri Informatics Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Min Soon KimUniversity of Missouri Informatics Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
University of Missouri Health System · USUniversity of Missouri · US

Funding

Washington University Center for Diabetes Translation Research P30DK092950 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Ross C Brownson, Debra Haire-Joshu · 2011 to 2026
$11.7M
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disorders from Center for Diabetes Translation Research (CDTR) Pilot & Feasibility (P&F) program grant P30DK092950NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the most common chronic diseases in the world. As a disease with long-term complications requiring changes in management, DM requires not only education at the time of diagnosis, but ongoing diabetes self-management education and support (DSME/S). In the United States, however, only a small proportion of people with DM receive DSME/S, although evidence supports benefits of ongoing DSME/S. The diabetes education that providers deliver during follow-up visits may be an important source for DSME/S for many people with DM.

methodsWe collected 200 clinic notes of follow-up visits for 100 adults with DM and studied the History of Present Illness (HPI) and Impression and Plan (I&P) sections. Using a codebook based on the seven principles of American Association of Diabetes Educators Self-Care Behaviors (AADE7), we conducted a multi-step deductive thematic analysis to determine the patterns of DSME/S information occurrence in clinic notes. Additionally, we used the generalised linear mixed models for investigating whether providers delivered DSME/S to people with DM based on patient characteristics.

resultsDuring follow-up visits, Monitoring was the most common self-care behaviour mentioned in both HPI and I&P sections. Being Active was the least common self-care behaviour mentioned in the HPI section and Healthy Coping was the least common self-care behaviour mentioned in the I&P section. We found providers delivered more information on Healthy Eating to men compared to women in I&P section. Generally, providers delivered DSME/S to people with DM regardless of patient characteristics.

conclusionsThis study focused on the frequency distribution of information providers delivered to the people with DM during follow-up clinic visits based on the AADE7. The results may indicate a lack of patient-centred education when people with DM visit providers for ongoing management. Further studies are needed to identify the underlying reasons why providers have difficulty delivering patient-centred education.

Indexed as

AdultAttitude to HealthData CollectionDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHealth EducationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient Education as TopicSelf CareUnited States

Identifiers

PMID31769903
PMCPMC7047595
OpenAlexW2990975223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.