ArticleInternational journal of clinical practice2020
Evaluation of provider documentation patterns as a tool to deliver ongoing patient-centred diabetes education and support.
Article in International journal of clinical practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Content Validation of an Electronic Health Record-Based Diabetes Self-Management Support Tool for Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: Qualitative Study.JMIR diabetes · 2026Article
- Developing and Evaluating SEE-Diabetes: A Patient-Centered Educational Decision Support System for Diabetes Care.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Article
- Telehealth Technologies in Diabetes Self-management and Education.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2024Review
- SEE-Diabetes, a patient-centered diabetes self-management education and support for older adults: Findings and information needs from patients' perspectives.Primary care diabetes · 2022Article
- Transforming AADE7 for Use in an Evaluation Framework for Health Information Technology in Diabetes Mellitus.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2022Article
- Feasibility and Acceptability of a Digital Patient-Reported Outcome Tool in Routine Outpatient Diabetes Care: Mixed Methods Formative Pilot Study.JMIR formative research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDiabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the most common chronic diseases in the world. As a disease with long-term complications requiring changes in management, DM requires not only education at the time of diagnosis, but ongoing diabetes self-management education and support (DSME/S). In the United States, however, only a small proportion of people with DM receive DSME/S, although evidence supports benefits of ongoing DSME/S. The diabetes education that providers deliver during follow-up visits may be an important source for DSME/S for many people with DM.
methodsWe collected 200 clinic notes of follow-up visits for 100 adults with DM and studied the History of Present Illness (HPI) and Impression and Plan (I&P) sections. Using a codebook based on the seven principles of American Association of Diabetes Educators Self-Care Behaviors (AADE7), we conducted a multi-step deductive thematic analysis to determine the patterns of DSME/S information occurrence in clinic notes. Additionally, we used the generalised linear mixed models for investigating whether providers delivered DSME/S to people with DM based on patient characteristics.
resultsDuring follow-up visits, Monitoring was the most common self-care behaviour mentioned in both HPI and I&P sections. Being Active was the least common self-care behaviour mentioned in the HPI section and Healthy Coping was the least common self-care behaviour mentioned in the I&P section. We found providers delivered more information on Healthy Eating to men compared to women in I&P section. Generally, providers delivered DSME/S to people with DM regardless of patient characteristics.
conclusionsThis study focused on the frequency distribution of information providers delivered to the people with DM during follow-up clinic visits based on the AADE7. The results may indicate a lack of patient-centred education when people with DM visit providers for ongoing management. Further studies are needed to identify the underlying reasons why providers have difficulty delivering patient-centred education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.