ArticleJMIR medical informatics2019
The Impacts of the Perceived Transparency of Privacy Policies and Trust in Providers for Building Trust in Health Information Exchange: Empirical Study.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Implementing electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Chronic Kidney Disease: a qualitative systematic review of barriers, enablers, and mechanisms.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2026Pooled it
- Patient and Public Willingness to Share Personal Health Data for Third-Party or Secondary Uses: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- A systematic literature review of health consumer attitudes towards secondary use and sharing of health administrative and clinical trial data: a focus on privacy, trust, and transparency.Systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Privacy Concerns and Configurational Patterns of Health Information Sharing Intention Among Patients with Chronic Diseases in Online Health Communities: An SEM and fsQCA Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- "Low Risk, High Happiness": A Review of Openly Declared Ethical and Legal Practices in Voice Biomarker Health-Tech Start-Ups.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026Review
- Beyond functional utility: ethical stewardship as a driver of digital healthcare platform adoption in low-resource settings.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- From digital product diffusion to sustainable population health: a two-layer complex-network evolutionary game analysis of digital manufacturing and health-oriented sport consumption.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Data governance transparency and psychological wellbeing in digital platforms: the roles of trust and emotional regulation.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- An Investigation Into the Comprehension, Perceptions, Application, and Determinants Affecting the Utilization of Deepseek Artificial Intelligence by Healthcare Professionals: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Using a Technology Acceptance Model to Explore the Intention to Use Digital Health Technologies Among People With Disabilities: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Engaging migrants and immigrants in genetics research.Nature genetics · 2025Review
- Determinants of consent for electronic health information exchange: an observational retrospective study.Health research policy and systems · 2025Observational
- Innovative approaches in discussions of diabetes among healthcare sector actors in Germany.Journal of public health policy · 2024Article
- New Horizons for Consumer-Mediated Health Information Exchange.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2024Review
- Successes and Barriers of Health Information Exchange Participation Across Hospitals in South Carolina From 2014 to 2020: Longitudinal Observational Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2023Observational
- Trust and Health Information Exchanges: Qualitative Analysis of the Intent to Share Personal Health Information.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Factors Influencing the Sharing of Personal Health Data Based on the Integrated Theory of Privacy Calculus and Theory of Planned Behaviors Framework: Results of a Cross-Sectional Study of Chinese Patients in the Yangtze River Delta.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Observational
- Web-Based Patient Recommender Systems for Preventive Care: Protocol for Empirical Research Propositions.JMIR research protocols · 2023Article
- Returning study results to research participants: Data access, format, and sharing preferences.International journal of medical informatics · 2023Article
- Promoting TEFCA with Blockchain Technology: A Decentralized Approach to Patient-centered Healthcare Data Management.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the context of exchange technologies, such as health information exchange (HIE), existing technology acceptance theories should be expanded to consider not only the cognitive beliefs resulting in adoption behavior but also the affect provoked by the sharing nature of the technology.
objectiveWe aimed to study HIE adoption using a trust-centered model. Based on the Theory of Reasoned Action, the technology adoption literature, and the trust transfer mechanism, we theoretically explained and empirically tested the impacts of the perceived transparency of privacy policy and trust in health care providers on cognitive and emotional trust in an HIE. Moreover, we analyzed the effects of cognitive and emotional trust on the intention to opt in to the HIE and willingness to disclose health information.
methodsA Web-based survey was conducted using data from a sample of 493 individuals who were aware of the HIE through experiences with a (or multiple) provider(s) participating in an HIE network.
resultsStructural Equation Modeling analysis results provided empirical support for the proposed model. Our findings indicated that when patients trust in health care providers, and they are aware of HIE security measures, HIE sharing procedures, and privacy terms, they feel more in control, more assured, and less at risk. Moreover, trust in providers has a significant moderating effect on building trust in HIE efforts (P<.05). Results also showed that patient trust in HIE may take the forms of opt-in intentions to HIE and patients' willingness to disclose health information that are exchanged through the HIE (P<.001).
conclusionsThe results of this research should be of interest to both academics and practitioners. The findings provide an in-depth dimension of the HIE privacy policy that should be addressed by the health care organizations to exchange personal health information in a secure and private manner. This study can contribute to trust transfer theory and enrich the literature on HIE efforts. Primary and secondary care providers can also identify how to leverage the benefit of patients' trust and trust transfer process to promote HIE initiatives nationwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.