ArticleTurkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology2020
Bortezomib-based Regimens Improve the Outcome of Patients with Primary or Secondary Plasma Cell Leukemia: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Article in Turkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patterns of Progression and Clinical Outcomes After First Progression in Patients With Primary Plasma Cell Leukemia.American journal of hematology · 2026Article
- Outcomes and treatment patterns in primary and secondary plasma cell leukemia: insights from a large US cohort study.Haematologica · 2025Article
- Survival Outcomes of Patients with Primary Plasma Cell Leukemia in the Era of Proteasome Inhibitors and Immunomodulatory Agents: A Real-Life Multicenter AnalysisTurkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology · 2024Article
- Poor outcome despite modern treatments: A retrospective study of 99 patients with primary and secondary plasma cell leukemia.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Clinicopathological and laboratory parameters of plasma cell leukemia among Indian population.American journal of blood research · 2022Article
- Targeted Venetoclax Therapy in t(11;14) Multiple Myeloma: Real World Data From Seven Hungarian Centers.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2022Article
- Case report: Plasma cell leukemia secondary to multiple myeloma successfully treated with anti-BCMA CAR-T cell therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Bortezomib-Based Regimens and Plasma Cell LeukemiaTurkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology · 2021Article
- Plasma Cell Leukemia: A Review of 3 Cases Managed in Kenya.Case reports in hematology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The management experience for plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is still limited by PCL’s rare incidence and aggressive course. The goal of this study was to further identify the efficacy of bortezomib-containing regimens for PCL in Chinese patients. Materials and Methods: In this study, 56 consecutive PCL patients [14 primary PCL (pPCL) and 42 secondary PCL (sPCL) cases] were retrospectively enrolled and 42/56 patients received bortezomib-based regimens (BBRs), including 10/14 pPCL and 32/42 sPCL patients. The patients’ survival data, clinical information, and safety data were collected and analyzed. Results: In pPCL and sPCL patients, the overall response rate in the bortezomib group was 90.0% and 25.0%, respectively. The median progression-free survival from PCL diagnosis for pPCL and sPCL was 8.3 months vs. 2.9 months (p=0.043) and median overall survival (OS) from PCL diagnosis was 23.3 months vs. 4.0 months. The OS for patients receiving BBRs was significantly longer for both pPCL (8.3 vs. 1.2 months, p=0.002) and sPCL (4.3 vs. 1.1 months, p<0.001). In multivariate COX analysis, BBR treatment [p=0.008, hazard ratio (HR)=0.38, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.19-0.77] and very good partial response or better (≥VGPR) (p=0.035, HR=0.19, 95% CI=0.04-0.74) were independent predictors of OS for sPCL patients. For pPCL patients, BBR predicted OS (p=0.029, HR=0.056, 95% CI=0.004-0.745) instead of ≥VGPR (p=0.272, HR=3.365, 95% CI=0.38-29.303). Conclusion: It was found that BBRs could significantly improve OS for both pPCL and sPCL patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.