Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31769168›Full record

SynthesisJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2019

Comparison of 24-hour urine and 24-hour diet recall for estimating dietary sodium intake in populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rachael McLean, Claire Cameron, Elizabeth Butcher, Nancy R Cook, Mark Woodward, Norm R C Campbell

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Laboratory-Analyzed Nutrient Values Diverge from Database Estimates in Research-Specific Diets (Notably for Protein, Iron, Sodium).Journal of food composition and analysis : an official publication of the United Nations University, International Network of Food Data Systems · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rachael McLeanDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-0005-328X
Claire CameronCenter for Biostatistics, Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-2151-4137
Elizabeth ButcherDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Nancy R CookDepartment of Medicine, Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9705-0842
Mark WoodwardThe George Institute for Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Norm R C CampbellLibin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1093-4742

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic literature review and meta-analysis examined whether 24-hour diet recall is a valid way to measure mean population sodium intake compared with the gold standard 24-hour urinary assessment. The authors searched electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus using pre-defined terms. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they assessed adult humans in free-living settings, and if they included group means for 24-hour diet recall and 24-hour urinary collection of sodium intake in the same participants. Studies that included populations with an active disease state that might interfere with normal sodium metabolism were excluded. Results of 28 studies are included in the meta-analysis. Overall, 24-hour diet recall underestimated population mean sodium intake by an average of 607 mg per day compared to the 24-hour urine collection. The difference between measures from 24-hour urine and 24-hour diet recall was smaller in studies conducted in high-income countries, in studies where multiple-pass methods of 24-hour diet recall were reported and where urine was validated for completeness. Higher quality studies also reported smaller differences between measures than lower quality studies. Monitoring of population sodium intake with 24-hour urinary excretion remains the most accurate method of assessment. Twenty-four-hour diet recall tends to underestimate intake, although high-quality 24-hour diet recall improves accuracy, and may be used if 24-hour urine is not feasible.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overDiet RecordsEatingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNoncommunicable DiseasesSodiumSodium, DietaryUrine Specimen CollectionSodiumSodium, Dietarydietary sodiumdiet surveysurine specimen collection

Identifiers

PMID31769168
PMCPMC8030385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.