Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31768970›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2020

The Bacterial Counterparts of the Eukaryotic Exosome: An Evolutionary Perspective.

Sandra C Viegas, Rute G Matos, Cecília M Arraiano

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sandra C ViegasInstituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier, Oeiras, Portugal. sviegas@itqb.unl.pt.
Rute G MatosInstituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier, Oeiras, Portugal.
Cecília M ArraianoInstituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier, Oeiras, Portugal. cecilia@itqb.unl.pt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are striking similarities between the processes of RNA degradation in bacteria and eukaryotes, which rely on the same basic set of enzymatic activities. In particular, enzymes that catalyze 3'→5' RNA decay share evolutionary relationships across the three domains of life. Over the years, a large body of biochemical and structural data has been generated that elucidated the mechanism of action of these enzymes. In this overview, to trace the evolutionary origins of the multisubunit RNA exosome complex, we compare the structural and functional characteristics of the eukaryotic and prokaryotic exoribonucleolytic activities.

Indexed as

BacteriaBiological EvolutionEukaryotaEukaryotic CellsExosome Multienzyme Ribonuclease ComplexExosomesHumansProkaryotic CellsRNAExosome Multienzyme Ribonuclease ComplexRNA3′→5′ exoribonucleaseDis3Dis3L1PNPaseRNase IIRNase R

Identifiers

PMID31768970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.