Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31768906›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2020

Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infection and Non-compliance with Treatment Guidelines in Adults in 10 US Geographical Locations, 2013-2015.

Shannon A Novosad, Yi Mu, Lisa G Winston, Helen Johnston, Elizabeth Basiliere, Danyel M Olson, Monica M Farley, Andrew Revis, Lucy Wilson, Rebecca Perlmutter and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Treating Initial and RecurrentMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  2. Impact of an Intervention Program onOpen forum infectious diseases · 2024
    Article
  3. Use of electronic health record data to identify hospital-associatedmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Association between prevalence of laboratory-identifiedInfection control and hospital epidemiology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Shannon A NovosadDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA. ydz1@cdc.gov.
Yi MuDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Lisa G WinstonSchool of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Helen JohnstonColorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, CO, USA.
Elizabeth BasiliereColorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, CO, USA.
Danyel M OlsonConnecticut Emerging Infections Program, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
Monica M FarleyEmory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Andrew RevisGeorgia Emerging Infections Program, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Lucy WilsonMaryland Department of Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Rebecca PerlmutterMaryland Department of Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Stacy M HolzbauerMinnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Tory WhittenMinnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Erin C PhippsNew Mexico Emerging Infections Program, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Ghinwa K DumyatiUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Zintars G BeldavsOregon Health Authority, Portland, OR, USA.
Valerie L S OcampoOregon Health Authority, Portland, OR, USA.
Corinne M DavisTennessee Department of Health, Nashville, TN, USA.
Marion KainerTennessee Department of Health, Nashville, TN, USA.
Dale N GerdingLoyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL, USA.
Alice Y GuhDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USColorado Department of Public Health and Environment · USMaryland Department of Health · USMinnesota Department of Health · USOregon Health Authority · USTennessee Department of Health · USAtlanta Research and Education Foundation · USEdward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital · USEmory University · USNational Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of New Mexico · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfectious Diseases Society of America/Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (IDSA/SHEA) guidelines describe recommended therapy for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI).

objectiveTo describe CDI treatment and, among those with severe CDI, determine predictors of adherence to the 2010 IDSA/SHEA treatment guidelines.

designWe analyzed 2013-2015 CDI treatment data collected through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Emerging Infections Program. Generalized linear mixed models were used to identify predictors of guideline-adherent therapy. PATIENTS: A CDI case was defined as a positive stool specimen in a person aged ≥ 18 years without a positive test in the prior 8 weeks; severe CDI cases were defined as having a white blood cell count ≥ 15,000 cells/μl. MAIN MEASURES: Prescribing and predictors of guideline-adherent CDI therapy for severe disease. KEY

resultsOf 18,243 cases, 14,257 (78%) were treated with metronidazole, 7683 (42%) with vancomycin, and 313 (2%) with fidaxomicin. The median duration of therapy was 14 (interquartile range, 11-15) days. Severe CDI was identified in 3250 (18%) cases; of 3121 with treatment data available, 1480 (47%) were prescribed guideline-adherent therapy. Among severe CDI cases, hospital admission (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.48; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.90, 3.24), age ≥ 65 years (aOR 1.37; 95% CI 1.10, 1.71), Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 3 (aOR 1.27; 95% CI 1.04, 1.55), immunosuppressive therapy (aOR 1.21; 95% CI 1.02, 1.42), and inflammatory bowel disease (aOR 1.56; 95% CI 1.13, 2.17) were associated with being prescribed guideline-adherent therapy.

conclusionsProvider adherence to the 2010 treatment guidelines for severe CDI was low. Although the updated 2017 CDI guidelines, which expand the use of oral vancomycin for all CDI, might improve adherence by removing the need to apply severity criteria, other efforts to improve adherence are likely needed, including educating providers and addressing barriers to prescribing guideline-adherent therapy, particularly in outpatient settings.

Indexed as

Clostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsAdultAgedClostridioidesHumansRetrospective StudiesVancomycinVancomycinClostridioides difficiledecision-makingepidemiologyinfectious disease

Identifiers

PMID31768906
PMCPMC7018854
OpenAlexW2990988819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.