ReviewProgress in biomaterials2019
Bone tissue regeneration: biology, strategies and interface studies.
Review in Progress in biomaterials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
116 citing papers in PubMed, 320 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biomimetic electrospun nanofibrous composites for bone tissue engineering: a review of materials, fabrication, and applications.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Review
- Synchronizing degradation with regeneration: a model-driven framework for designing biodegradable biomaterials in bone tissue engineering.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Review
- Enhancing the osteogenic potential of 3D-printed polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds via in-situ ZIF-8 surface modification.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Article
- Arginine Methylation Antagonizes TEAD3-Mediated Repression to Promote Osteogenic Differentiation by Disrupting RUNX2-Sequestrating Condensates.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Advancements in bone organoids: perspectives on construction methodologies and application strategies.Journal of advanced research · 2026Review
- Recent advances in biomaterials for bone regeneration: Bridging innovation and clinical translation.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Computational Intelligence in Stochastic Reconstruction of Porous Microstructures for Image-Based Poro/Micro-Mechanical Modeling.Archives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews · 2026Review
- Physicochemical Characterization, Cytotoxicity, and In Vivo Evaluation of a Hydroxyapatite-Silver Composite for Bone Regeneration.BioMed research international · 2026Article
- Metal-Based Categorization of Recent Metal Organic Frameworks with Application in Bone Disease Treatment.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Review
- Synergistic and Intelligent Hydrogel for Conducting Osteoblast Proliferation: Synthesis, Characterization, and Multifunctional Properties.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- An Update Regarding the Use of Contemporary Dental Materials in Periodontal Regeneration.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Plasma activated PVDF-BaTiOScientific reports · 2025Article
- Histological evaluation of osteogenesis using stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth seeded in polymethylmethacrylate-hydroxyapatite scaffold.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2025Article
- Fabrication of biodegradable nanocomposite scaffolds with hydroxyapatite, magnetic clay, and graphene oxide for bone tissue engineering.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- 3D-printed vancomycin-eluting PGCL/MXene bifunctional scaffold for management of infected bone defects.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Enhancing in vitro osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells via sustained dexamethasone delivery in 3D-Printed hybrid scaffolds based on polycaprolactone-nanohydroxyapatite/alginate-gelatin for bone regeneration.Journal of biological engineering · 2025Article
- Review
- Addressing the challenges of infectious bone defects: a review of recent advances in bifunctional biomaterials.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Bio-Informed Porous Mineral-Based Composites.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Review
- Dual release scaffolds as a promising strategy for enhancing bone regeneration: an updated review.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025Review
56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nowadays, bone diseases and defects as a result of trauma, cancers, infections and degenerative and inflammatory conditions are increasing. Consequently, bone repair and replacement have been developed with improvement of orthopedic technologies and biomaterials of superior properties. This review paper is intended to sum up and discuss the most relevant studies performed in the field of bone biology and bone regeneration approaches. Therefore, the bone tissue regeneration was investigated by synthetic substitutes, scaffolds incorporating active molecules, nanomedicine, cell-based products, biomimetic fibrous and nonfibrous substitutes, biomaterial-based three-dimensional (3D) cell-printing substitutes, bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composites, magnetic field and nano-scaffolds with stem cells and bone-biomaterials interface studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.