ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2020
Synergy of CT and MRI in detecting trajectories of lodged bullets in decedents and potential hazards concerning the heating and movement of bullets during MRI.
Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond the limits of space and time: Can 4D imaging enhance postmortem investigation?European radiology experimental · 2026Review
- The Current Status of Virtual Autopsy Using Combined Imaging Modalities: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: A New Tool on the Horizon for Forensic Dentistry.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Forensic imaging: a powerful tool in modern forensic investigation.Forensic sciences research · 2022Review
- Can post-mortem coronary artery calcium scores aid diagnosis in young sudden death?Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2021Article
- Noninvasive 7 tesla MRI of fatal craniocerebral gunshots - a glance into the future of radiologic wound ballistics.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2020Article
- Heavy metal in radiology: how to reliably differentiate between lodged copper and lead bullets using CT numbers.European radiology experimental · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in addition to computed tomography (CT) in gunshot wound cases with bullets or pellets lodged inside the head. In this context, the potential heating and movement of the lodged bullets were additionally investigated using animal models. Eleven forensic cases of penetrating gunshot wounds underwent CT and MRI. The data of each imaging modality were reviewed according to the following relevant characteristics: bony lesion at the entrance, intracranial bone fragments, intracranial metal fragments, gunshot residues, the wound channel and the severity of metal artifacts. Four-point Likert scales were used for the assessment. The heating of projectiles and their magnetic field interactions with the static magnetic field were assessed using animal models. MRI presented major advantages in cases with transversal trajectories and non-ferromagnetic bullets compared to CT. In general, MRI enabled a clear visualization of the wound channel and gunshot-related soft tissue injuries. An image fusion of CT and MRI datasets demonstrated the individual strengths of both modalities. Radio frequency (RF)-induced heating due to bullets lodged inside the brain tissue was invalidated. The likelihood of ferromagnetic projectile migration inside brain tissue is low. MRI of decedents with a bullet lodged inside their heads is viable and provides a valuable supplement to CT. The in situ, noninvasive depiction of the wound channel and gunshot-related soft tissue injuries on MRI can contribute to the knowledge of wound ballistics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31768872What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.