Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31768865›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental nephrology2020

Serum N-glycan profiling can predict biopsy-proven graft rejection after living kidney transplantation.

Osamu Soma, Shingo Hatakeyama, Tohru Yoneyama, Mitsuru Saito, Hideo Sasaki, Yuki Tobisawa, Daisuke Noro, Yuichiro Suzuki, Masakazu Tanaka, Shin-Ichiro Nishimura and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Discovery and validation of a novel blood-based molecular biomarker of rejection following liver transplantation.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2020
    Article
  4. Recent Advances on Biomarkers of Early and Late Kidney Graft Dysfunction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Osamu SomaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-chou, Hirosaki, 036-8562, Japan.
Shingo HatakeyamaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-chou, Hirosaki, 036-8562, Japan. shingoh@hirosaki-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0026-4079
Tohru YoneyamaDepartment of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Mitsuru SaitoDepartment of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Hideo SasakiDepartment of Urology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
Yuki TobisawaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-chou, Hirosaki, 036-8562, Japan.
Daisuke NoroDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-chou, Hirosaki, 036-8562, Japan.
Yuichiro SuzukiDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-chou, Hirosaki, 036-8562, Japan.
Masakazu TanakaFrontier Research Centre for Advanced Material and Life Science, Graduate School of Life Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Shin-Ichiro NishimuraFrontier Research Centre for Advanced Material and Life Science, Graduate School of Life Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Hiroshi HaradaDepartment of Kidney Transplant Surgery, Sapporo City General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Hideki IshidaDepartment of Urology, Tokyo Woman's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazunari TanabeDepartment of Urology, Tokyo Woman's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Shigeru SatohDepartment of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Chikara OhyamaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-chou, Hirosaki, 036-8562, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 15H02563 and 19H05556Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 17K11119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate whether serum N-glycan profile can be used as a diagnostic marker of graft rejection after living-donor kidney transplants (KT).

methodsWe retrospectively examined 174 KT recipients at five medical centers. N-Glycan levels were analyzed in postoperative serum samples using glycoblotting combined with mass spectrometry. We developed an integrated score to predict graft rejection based on a combination of age, gender, immunological risk factors, and serum N-glycan levels at post-KT day D1 and D7. Rejection-free survival rates stratified by the sum of integrated scores (D1 + D7) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves.

resultsOf 174, 52 showed graft rejection (Rejection-pos. group) and 122 recipients did not show graft rejection (Rejection-neg. group). The integrated scores were significantly higher in the Rejection-pos. group than those of the Rejection-neg. group. Area-under-curve (AUC) value of integrated scores at post-KT D1, and D7 were 0.84 and 0.84, respectively. The sum of integrated scores (D1 + D7) ≥ 0.50 identified graft rejection with 81% sensitivity and 80% specificity; with an AUC value of 0.87. Recipients with higher sum of integrated scores (D1 + D7 ≥ 0.5) had significantly shorter rejection-free survival than those with lower scores.

conclusionEvaluation of serum N-glycosylation profiles can identify recipients who are prone to rejection.

Indexed as

Living DonorsAdultBiomarkersFemaleGraft RejectionHumansJapanKidney TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedPolysaccharidesPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTime FactorsBiomarkersPolysaccharidesAcute rejectionBiomarkersGlycobiologyKidney transplantationN-Glycan

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.