Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31768863›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental nephrology2020

Utility and safety of early allograft biopsy in adult deceased donor kidney transplant recipients.

Evaldo Favi, Ajith James, Carmelo Puliatti, Phil Whatling, Mariano Ferraresso, Chiara Rui, Roberto Cacciola

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Evaldo FaviRenal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza n. 35, 20122, Milan, Italy. evaldofavi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6465-428X
Ajith JamesNephrology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Whitechapel Rd, London, E1 1BB, UK.
Carmelo PuliattiOrgan Transplantation, Parma University Hospital, Via A. Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7398-2648
Phil WhatlingNephrology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Whitechapel Rd, London, E1 1BB, UK.
Mariano FerraressoRenal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza n. 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3410-9090
Chiara RuiRenal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza n. 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Roberto CacciolaHPB and Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Tor Vergata University, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8363-1358

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDelayed graft function (DGF) is considered a risk factor for rejection after kidney transplantation (KTx). Clinical guidelines recommend weekly allograft biopsy until DGF resolves. However, who may benefit the most from such an aggressive policy and when histology should be evaluated remain debated.

methodsWe analyzed 223 biopsies in 145 deceased donor KTx treated with basiliximab or anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) and calcineurin inhibitor-based maintenance. The aim of the study was to assess the utility and safety of biopsies performed within 28 days of transplant. Relationships between transplant characteristics, indication, timing, and biopsy-related outcomes were evaluated.

resultsMain indication for biopsy was DGF (87.8%) followed by lack of improvement in graft function (9.2%), and worsening graft function (3.1%). Acute tubular necrosis was the leading diagnosis (89.8%) whereas rejection was detected in 8.2% specimens. Rejection was more frequent in patients biopsied due to worsening graft function or lack of improvement in graft function than DGF (66.7% vs. 3.5%; P = 0.0075 and 33.3% vs. 3.5%; P = 0.0104, respectively) and in biopsies performed between day 15 and 28 than from day 0 to 14 (31.2% vs. 3.7%; P = 0.0002). Complication rate was 4.1%. Management was affected by the information gained with histology in 12.2% cases (7% considering DGF).

conclusionsIn low-immunological risk recipients treated with induction and calcineurin inhibitors maintenance, protocol biopsies obtained within 2 weeks of surgery to rule out rejection during DGF do not necessarily offer a favourable balance between risks and benefits. In these patients, a tailored approach may minimize complications thus optimizing results.

Indexed as

AdultAllograftsBiopsyDelayed Graft FunctionFemaleHumansKidneyKidney TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAllograftBiopsyComplicationDelayed graft functionKidney transplantRejection

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.