Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31768805›Full record

ArticleJournal of psycholinguistic research2020

Examining the Effect of Semantic Relatedness on the Acquisition of English Collocations.

Michael Yi-Chao Jiang, Morris Siu-Yung Jong, Chi-Shing Tse, Ching-Sing Chai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael Yi-Chao JiangDepartment of Curriculum and Instruction, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong S.A.R., China. michael.jiang@link.cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6807-4039
Morris Siu-Yung JongDepartment of Curriculum and Instruction, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong S.A.R., China.
Chi-Shing TseDepartment of Educational Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong S.A.R., China.
Ching-Sing ChaiDepartment of Curriculum and Instruction, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong S.A.R., China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines whether semantic relatedness facilitates or impedes the acquisition of English collocations by conducting two experiments respectively on Chinese undergraduates. Each experiment was composed of a reading session, a productive test, and a receptive test. Experiment 1 began with the reading session of 28 paired-up words and their collocations (in sentence context). Those words were counterbalanced between two randomly selected groups by cross-matching on semantic relatedness. Results of the productive test revealed that the participants scored significantly higher on test items that were semantically related than the randomly cross-paired counterparts. However, for the receptive test, the participants performed significantly better on semantically unrelated items. Experiment 2 was similar to Experiment 1 except that the word pairs selected were only semantically related and did not have any shared morphemes. Experiment 2 also revealed consistent results. The results of the two experiments consistently illustrate that semantic relatedness may exert a facilitatory effect on language output but an inhibitory effect on the process of language input.

Indexed as

MultilingualismSemanticsVocabularyAdultChinaHumansLanguage TestsReadingYoung AdultAcquisitionEnglish collocationsFacilitatory effectInhibitory effectSemantic relatedness

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.