Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31768803›Full record

Trial reportInternational urology and nephrology2020

Comparison of the effects of valsartan plus activated vitamin D versus valsartan alone in IgA nephropathy with moderate proteinuria.

Liu Xiaowei, Wang Bo, Li Li, Zhang Peng

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International urology and nephrology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Non-immunosuppressive treatment for IgA nephropathy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Vitamin D and Glomerulonephritis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Liu XiaoweiDepartment of Nephrology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, No. 127 West Changle Road, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi Province, China.
Wang BoDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi Province, China.
Li LiDepartment of Nephrology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, No. 127 West Changle Road, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi Province, China.
Zhang PengDepartment of Nephrology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, No. 127 West Changle Road, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi Province, China. zhangpeng@fmmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9381-8511
Xijing Hospital · CNAir Force Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsTo compare the effects of valsartan plus activated vitamin D with valsartan alone on urinary protein excretion and eGFR in IgA nephropathy with moderate proteinuria.

methodsA prospective, single-center, randomized, controlled study was performed between Jan, 2008 and Jan, 2018 on patients with IgA nephropathy who had moderate proteinuria with urinary protein excretion 1.0-3.0 g/24 h. These IgAN patients were randomly assigned to receive either valsartan 160 mg/day treatment or valsartan 160 mg/day plus activated vitamin D (calcitriol) 0.5 μg/day treatments. The changes of the clinical, biochemical data, and the adverse events during the observation period were all analyzed in the two groups. The primary endpoint was defined as changes in urinary protein excretion at week 24 compared with the baseline and the secondary endpoint was to observe the changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between baseline and the end of the study.

resultsBaseline characteristics between the two groups were comparable. At the end of the treatment period, urinary protein excretion in both two groups decreased significantly (P < 0.05). However, there was a more significant decrease in proteinuria in IgAN patients who received valsartan plus activated vitamin D treatment (from 2.39 ± 0.77 to 1.43 ± 0.57 g/24 h, P < 0.01) compared to valsartan treatment alone (from 2.46 ± 0.81 to 1.78 ± 0.60 g/24 h, P < 0.05). The percentage change in urine protein excretion at week 24 was  - 40.2% in valsartan plus activated vitamin D treatment group (P < 0.01) and - 27.6% in valsartan treatment group (P < 0.05). No significant change in blood pressure, estimated glomerular filtration rate, serum calcium, and serum potassium was observed. The incidence of adverse events was similar between the two groups, respectively (P > 0.05).

conclusionCombination therapy with valsartan plus activated vitamin D is more effective than valsartan alone in reduction of moderate proteinuria in IgA nephropathy and without more adverse events.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntihypertensive AgentsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateGlomerulonephritis, IGAHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesProteinuriaValsartanVitamin DVitaminsAntihypertensive AgentsValsartanVitamin DVitaminsActivated vitamin DIgA nephropathyValsartan

Identifiers

PMID31768803
OpenAlexW2991136420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.