ReviewCurrent oncology reports2019
Upfront Therapies and Downstream Effects: Navigating Late Effects in Childhood Cancer Survivors in the Current Era.
Review in Current oncology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparisons between individual- and area-level measures of socioeconomic status among childhood cancer patients: A report from the Children's Oncology Group (COG).Cancer epidemiology · 2026Article
- Global, regional, and national epidemiology of childhood Burkitt Lymphoma from 1990 to 2021: statistical analysis of incidence, mortality, and DALYs.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Unconventional Oil and Gas Development Exposure and Risk of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Case-Control Study in Pennsylvania, 2009-2017.Environmental health perspectives · 2022Article
- Childhood survivors of high-risk neuroblastoma show signs of immune recovery and not immunosenescence.European journal of immunology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewAs survival rates of those diagnosed with childhood cancer improve over time, the number of long-term survivors continues to grow. Advances have not only been made in the upfront treatment of childhood cancer, but also in the identification and treatment of late complications that may arise as a result of the chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgical interventions required to provide a cure. RECENT
findingsAs new therapies emerge that are often more targeted to cancerous cells while sparing healthy tissues, the hope is that cure can be achieved without the same long-term side effects for survivors. However, much is unknown regarding how these novel interventions will impact patients in the years to come. It is critical that we continue to follow patients treated with new modalities in order to identify and treat the long-term complications that may arise in future childhood cancer survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.