Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31768713›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2019

Enhanced GROMACS: toward a better numerical simulation framework.

Hojjat Rakhshani, Effat Dehghanian, Amin Rahati

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Identification of a novelFrontiers in genetics · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Diagnostic and treatment value ofJournal of thoracic disease · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hojjat RakhshaniUniversity of Upper Alsace, Mulhouse, France.
Effat DehghanianDepartment of Chemistry, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran. dehghanian@chem.usb.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3717-0068
Amin RahatiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The GROMACS software package represented a promising direction toward the molecular dynamic simulation and there is ongoing interest to extend it. In this study, we introduce a new component into the conventional package with the goal being to facilitate the process of finding the native structure of proteins with minimal free-energy value. We achieved this through incorporating a wide range of metaheuristic optimization algorithms and force fields, leading up to the EGROMACS molecular simulation toolkit. Compared with other programs, the EGROMACS supports all standard force fields as well as new minimization algorithms and Hybrid MPI/OpenMP parallelization. We applied the proposed EGROMACS framework to minimize the structure of several target sequences. The obtained results showed comparative performance of the introduced framework to current well-known molecular simulation algorithms. This extension to the GROMACS, however, uses metaheuristic algorithms to address the problem.

Indexed as

GROMACS software packageMetaheuristic optimization algorithmsMolecular dynamic simulationStructure of proteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.