Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31768677›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of hematology2020

The predictive value of minimal residual disease when facing the inconsistent results detected by real-time quantitative PCR and flow cytometry in NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia.

Meng-Ge Gao, Guo-Rui Ruan, Ying-Jun Chang, Yan-Rong Liu, Ya-Zhen Qin, Qian Jiang, Hao Jiang, Xiao-Jun Huang, Xiao-Su Zhao

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of hematology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Cancers · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meng-Ge GaoNational Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 South Street of Xizhimen, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China.
Guo-Rui RuanNational Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 South Street of Xizhimen, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China.
Ying-Jun ChangNational Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 South Street of Xizhimen, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China.
Yan-Rong LiuNational Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 South Street of Xizhimen, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China.
Ya-Zhen QinNational Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 South Street of Xizhimen, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China.
Qian JiangNational Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 South Street of Xizhimen, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China.
Hao JiangNational Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 South Street of Xizhimen, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China.
Xiao-Jun HuangNational Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 South Street of Xizhimen, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China.
Xiao-Su ZhaoNational Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 South Street of Xizhimen, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China. zhao.xiaosu@outlook.com.
Peking University · CNPeking University People's Hospital · CN

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2017YFA0104500National Natural Science Foundation of China 81621001National Natural Science Foundation of China 81670175National Natural Science Foundation of China 81870137
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with nucleophosmin 1 mutation (NPM1m), multiparameter flow cytometry (FCM) and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) are used to monitor minimal residual disease (MRD). However, the results of the two methods are sometimes inconsistent. This study was designed to analyze how to address the discordant results of FCM and RQ-PCR in AML patients undergoing chemotherapy, especially when positive FCM (FCM+) and negative NPM1m (NPM1m-) results are detected in the same sample. Our study included 93 AML patients with NPM1m positive (NPM1m+) who received chemotherapy but did not undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We monitored NPM1m and leukemia-associated immunophenotypes (LAIPs) by RQ-PCR and FCM, respectively, to assess MRD after each chemotherapy course. After each course of chemotherapy, all patients were classified into four groups based on the results of FCM and RQ-PCR: both negative (group 1, FCM-NPM1m-), single positive (group 2, FCM-NPM1m+; group 3, FCM+NPM1m-), or both positive (group 4, FCM+NPM1m+). The results showed that there was not a significant difference in the 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) after each course of chemotherapy between group 2 and group 3. Furthermore, patients in groups 2 and 3 had a lower 2-year CIR than those in group 4 and a significantly higher 2-year CIR than those in group 1 after the first two courses. The patients in group 4 had a significantly higher 2-year CIR than those in group 1 after the first two courses. These results suggested that in the MRD monitoring process of AML patients, when the results of FCM and RQ-PCR are inconsistent (especially when FCM is positive and NPM1m is negative), these single-positive results still have predictive significance for relapse.

Indexed as

Flow CytometryLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMutationNeoplasm ProteinsNuclear ProteinsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm, ResidualNucleophosminPredictive Value of TestsNeoplasm ProteinsNPM1 protein, humanNuclear ProteinsNucleophosminAcute myeloid leukemiaFlow cytometry monitoringMinimal residual diseaseNPM1 mutation

Identifiers

PMID31768677
OpenAlexW2990956587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.