Trial reportAnnals of hematology2020
The predictive value of minimal residual disease when facing the inconsistent results detected by real-time quantitative PCR and flow cytometry in NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia.
Trial report in Annals of hematology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimization of Analytical Performances and Routine Laboratory Implementation of NPM1 Mutation Detection by Digital PCR in the Diagnosis and Monitoring of NPM1 -Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemias.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026Article
- Analytical validation of a modified wild-type blocker qpcr assay for the sensitive DNA-based detection of NPM1 type A in acute myeloid leukemia.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Review
- Prognostic covariates associated with outcomes in patients with NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Article
- [Screening of MLL fusion genes and rare breakpoint cases in patients with acute myeloid leukemia].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2025Article
- Pretransplantation risk factors for positive MRD after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in AML patients: a prospective study.Bone marrow transplantation · 2025Article
- Single-cell immune landscape of measurable residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia.Science China. Life sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Bone marrow CD34+ molecular chimerism as an early predictor of relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- [Dynamic assessment of WT1 for predicting the relapse of acute myeloid leukemia patients with MLL rearrangements after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2022Article
- Article
- The consensus from The Chinese Society of Hematology on indications, conditioning regimens and donor selection for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: 2021 update.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2021Article
- Measurable Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Using Flow Cytometry: A Review of Where We Are and Where We Are Going.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Residual disease by flow cytometry in patients with nucleophosmin-mutated acute myeloblastic leukemia.Annals of hematology · 2020Article
- Increased immature T-cells detected by flow cytometry in post chemotherapeutic patients with acute myeloid leukemia, a case report and small series study.American journal of blood research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
For acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with nucleophosmin 1 mutation (NPM1m), multiparameter flow cytometry (FCM) and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) are used to monitor minimal residual disease (MRD). However, the results of the two methods are sometimes inconsistent. This study was designed to analyze how to address the discordant results of FCM and RQ-PCR in AML patients undergoing chemotherapy, especially when positive FCM (FCM+) and negative NPM1m (NPM1m-) results are detected in the same sample. Our study included 93 AML patients with NPM1m positive (NPM1m+) who received chemotherapy but did not undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We monitored NPM1m and leukemia-associated immunophenotypes (LAIPs) by RQ-PCR and FCM, respectively, to assess MRD after each chemotherapy course. After each course of chemotherapy, all patients were classified into four groups based on the results of FCM and RQ-PCR: both negative (group 1, FCM-NPM1m-), single positive (group 2, FCM-NPM1m+; group 3, FCM+NPM1m-), or both positive (group 4, FCM+NPM1m+). The results showed that there was not a significant difference in the 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) after each course of chemotherapy between group 2 and group 3. Furthermore, patients in groups 2 and 3 had a lower 2-year CIR than those in group 4 and a significantly higher 2-year CIR than those in group 1 after the first two courses. The patients in group 4 had a significantly higher 2-year CIR than those in group 1 after the first two courses. These results suggested that in the MRD monitoring process of AML patients, when the results of FCM and RQ-PCR are inconsistent (especially when FCM is positive and NPM1m is negative), these single-positive results still have predictive significance for relapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.