Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31768625›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2020

Utility of FOS as diagnostic marker for osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma.

Suk Wai Lam, Arjen H G Cleven, Herman M Kroon, Inge H Briaire-de Bruijn, Karoly Szuhai, Judith V M G Bovée

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Primary osseous tumors of the orbit.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma of the cervical spine in the pediatric population: analysis of the literature and experience with four operated cases.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. [Bone tumors in children and adolescents].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Methylation and copy number profiling: emerging tools to differentiate osteoblastoma from malignant mimics?Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Suk Wai LamDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Arjen H G ClevenDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Herman M KroonDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Inge H Briaire-de BruijnDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Karoly SzuhaiDepartment of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Einthovenweg 20, 2333, ZC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Judith V M G BovéeDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands. j.v.m.g.bovee@lumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1155-0481
Leiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma are bone-forming tumors shown to harbor FOS (87%) and FOSB (3%) rearrangements. The aim was to evaluate the immunohistochemical expression of FOS and FOSB in these tumors in comparison to other bone tumors, to evaluate the influence of decalcification, and to correlate immunohistochemical findings with the underlying genetic alteration using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Immunohistochemistry using whole sections was performed on osteoid osteoma (n=23), osteoblastoma (n=22), osteoblastoma-like osteosarcoma (n=3), reactive (n=3), and proliferative (n=11) bone lesions. Immunoreactivity in giant cell tumor of bone (n=74), aneurysmal bone cyst (n=6), chondromyxoid fibroma (n=20), osteosarcoma (n=85), chondroblastoma (n=17), and clear cell chondrosarcoma (n=20) was assessed using tissue micro arrays. Strong nuclear expression of FOS in > 50% of the tumor cells was observed in all osteoid osteomas (22/22), in 57% of osteoblastomas (12/21) and in 3/197 control cases. FOS immunoreactivity disappeared after > 3 days decalcification. FOS rearrangements were present in 94% of osteoid osteomas and osteoblastomas, with a concordance of 86% between FISH and immunohistochemistry. Two osteoblastomas (5%) were positive for FOSB, as opposed to 8/177 control cases. Additional FISH revealed no FOSB rearrangements in these cases. To conclude, in short decalcified biopsies, FOS immunohistochemistry can be used to diagnose osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma, as overexpression is seen in the majority, being rare in their mimics. FOS immunohistochemistry should not be used after long decalcification. Moreover, low level of focal expression found in other lesions and tissues might cause diagnostic problems, in which case FISH could be employed.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBiomarkers, TumorBone NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoblastomaOsteoma, OsteoidProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosYoung AdultBiomarkers, TumorFOSB protein, humanFOS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosBone tumorsFluorescence in situ hybridizationFOSImmunohistochemistryOsteoblastomaOsteoid osteoma

Identifiers

PMID31768625
PMCPMC7085481
OpenAlexW2989745550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.