Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31768622›Full record

ArticleDevelopment genes and evolution2020

Prey to predator body size ratio in the evolution of cooperative hunting-a social spider test case.

Lena Grinsted, Mads F Schou, Virginia Settepani, Christina Holm, Tharina L Bird, Trine Bilde

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Development genes and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Group-Living SpiderInsects · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Lena GrinstedSchool of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3904-3721
Mads F SchouDepartment of Biology, Lund University, 22362, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5521-5269
Virginia SettepaniDepartment of Biology, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 114-116, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Christina HolmDepartment of Biology, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 114-116, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Tharina L BirdDepartment of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Botswana International University of Science and Technology (BIUST), Plot, 10071, Palapye, Botswana.
Trine BildeDepartment of Biology, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 114-116, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark. trine.bilde@bios.au.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-0341-161X
Aarhus University · DKBotswana International University of Science and Technology · BWLund University · SERoyal Holloway University of London · GB

Funding

FP6-INFRASTRUCTURES Drylands Research SSA grant EC contract Number: 026064FP7 Ideas: European Research Council ERC StG-2011-282163Leverhulme Trust ECF-2016-080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the benefits of cooperative hunting may be that predators can subdue larger prey. In spiders, cooperative, social species can capture prey many times larger than an individual predator. However, we propose that cooperative prey capture does not have to be associated with larger caught prey per se, but with an increase in the ratio of prey to predator body size. This can be achieved either by catching larger prey while keeping predator body size constant, or by evolving a smaller predator body size while maintaining capture of large prey. We show that within a genus of relatively large spiders, Stegodyphus, subsocial spiders representing the ancestral state of social species are capable of catching the largest prey available in the environment. Hence, within this genus, the evolution of cooperation would not provide access to otherwise inaccessible, large prey. Instead, we show that social Stegodyphus spiders are smaller than their subsocial counterparts, while catching similar sized prey, leading to the predicted increase in prey-predator size ratio with sociality. We further show that in a genus of small spiders, Anelosimus, the level of sociality is associated with an increased size of prey caught while predator size is unaffected by sociality, leading to a similar, predicted increase in prey-predator size ratio. In summary, we find support for our proposed 'prey to predator size ratio hypothesis' and discuss how relaxed selection on large body size in the evolution of social, cooperative living may provide adaptive benefits for ancestrally relatively large predators.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalBody SizeAnimalsBiological EvolutionCorrelation of DataPhylogenyPredatory BehaviorSocial BehaviorSpidersDietary nicheGroup livingPhenotypic plasticityPredator-prey interactionsSocial evolution

Identifiers

PMID31768622
OpenAlexW2991283371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.