Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31768415›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2020

Automated calcium scores collected during myocardial perfusion imaging improve identification of obstructive coronary artery disease.

Mirthe Dekker, Farahnaz Waissi, Ingrid E M Bank, Nikolas Lessmann, Ivana Išgum, Birgitta K Velthuis, Asbjørn M Scholtens, Geert E Leenders, Gerard Pasterkamp, Dominique P V de Kleijn and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Combined evaluation of CAC score and myocardial perfusion imaging in patients at risk of cardiovascular disease: where are we and what do the data say.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Review
  3. The addition of coronary artery calcium to myocardial perfusion: Double or nothing?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  4. Myocardial perfusion imaging and CAC score: Not only a brick in the wall.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Automation in Nuclear Cardiology: Time for Flurpiridaz to Join the Club.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mirthe DekkerDepartment of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Farahnaz WaissiDepartment of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Ingrid E M BankDepartment of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
Nikolas LessmannImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Ivana IšgumImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Birgitta K VelthuisDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Asbjørn M ScholtensDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Meander Medical Center, the Netherlands.
Geert E LeendersDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Gerard PasterkampDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Dominique P V de KleijnDepartment of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Leo TimmersDepartment of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
Arend MosterdDepartment of Cardiology, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ Amersfoort, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMyocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is an accurate noninvasive test for patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and coronary artery calcium (CAC) score is known to be a powerful predictor of cardiovascular events. Collection of CAC scores simultaneously with MPI is unexplored.

aimWe aimed to investigate whether automatically derived CAC scores during myocardial perfusion imaging would further improve the diagnostic accuracy of MPI to detect obstructive CAD.

methodsWe analyzed 150 consecutive patients without a history of coronary revascularization with suspected obstructive CAD who were referred for 82Rb PET/CT and available coronary angiographic data. Myocardial perfusion was evaluated both semi quantitatively as well as quantitatively according to the European guidelines. CAC scores were automatically derived from the low-dose attenuation correction CT scans using previously developed software based on deep learning. Obstructive CAD was defined as stenosis >70% (or >50% in the left main coronary artery) and/or fractional flow reserve (FFR) ≤0.80.

resultsIn total 58% of patients had obstructive CAD of which seventy-four percent were male. Addition of CAC scores to MPI and clinical predictors significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy of MPI to detect obstructive CAD. The area under the curve (AUC) increased from 0.87 to 0.91 (p: 0.025). Sensitivity and specificity analysis showed an incremental decrease in false negative tests with our MPI + CAC approach (n = 14 to n = 4), as a consequence an increase in false positive tests was seen (n = 11 to n = 28).

conclusionCAC scores collected simultaneously with MPI improve the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients without a history of coronary revascularization.

Indexed as

AP, Angina pectorisAUC, Area under the curveCABG, Coronary artery bypass gratingCAC, Coronary artery calciumCAD, Coronary artery diseaseCAG, Coronary angiographyCardiovascular imagingCFR, Coronary flow reserveCI, Confidence intervalCoronary artery calciumCVD, Cardiovascular diseaseDeep learningFFR, Fractional flow reserveMBF, Myocardial blood flowMI, myocardial infractionMPI, Myocardial perfusion imagingMyocardial perfusion imagingNPV, Negative predictive valueObstructive coronary artery diseaseOR, Odds ratioPCI, Percutaneous coronary interventionPET/CT, Positron emission tomography/computed tomographyPPV, Positive predictive valueQCA, Quantitative coronary angiographyROC, Receiver operator characteristicSDS, Summed difference scoreSD, Standard deviationWMA, Wall motion abnormalities

Identifiers

PMID31768415
PMCPMC6872848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.