ReviewOcular oncology and pathology2019
Conjunctival Melanoma in Childhood and Adolescence: A Systematic Review.
Review in Ocular oncology and pathology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Conjunctival melanoma: comprehensive insights into clinical features, genetic alterations, and modern treatment approaches.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2025Review
- Conjunctival Melanoma: A Clinical Review and Update.Cancers · 2024Review
- Pediatric conjunctival melanoma: A comprehensive case report and literature review.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2024Article
- Genetics of Ocular Melanoma: Insights into Genetics, Inheritance and Testing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Epidemiological and histopathological aspects of ocular melanomas in Northeastern Romania.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieArticle
- Clinical and immunohistopathological study of conjunctival melanocytic lesions in pediatric and adolescent patients. A case series.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieArticle
- Unusual conjunctival melanocytic proliferations. Report of five cases and review of the literature.Survey of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConjunctival melanoma is rare in adults and rarer in children. We systematically reviewed the presentation, diagnostic and management strategies as well as outcomes for conjunctival melanoma in children and adolescents.
methodsThe following databases were searched: Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus for cases of conjunctival melanoma occurring in children and adolescents < 18 years of age.
resultsSeventeen studies with 32 patients (18 males) were identified. The median age at presentation was 11 years (range 4-18 years). Most patients were white. Most patients presented with a conjunctival mass or naevus with a recent history of growth or change. Excision biopsy provided diagnosis and management for all cases. Adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy were also used. One patient had metastatic disease at diagnosis and 3 developed metastatic disease (range 1-10 months). Two patients died from disease and one was alive with metastatic disease. Two patients had disease recurrence. Outcomes were observed to be better where diagnosis was made earlier and "no-touch" excision biopsy was performed in an appropriate specialist setting.
conclusionsConjunctival melanoma occurs rarely in children and adolescents. Surgery is the mainstay of management. The prognosis is guarded in metastatic disease due to the small sample size and limited follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.