ArticleAsian journal of urology2019
Use of a specific questionnaire and perineal electromyography to assess neuropathic pain after radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Article in Asian journal of urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Bibliometric Analysis of Research Relating to Perineal Pain Reported over the Period 1981 to 2021.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Risk factors for moderate-to-severe postoperative pain after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveProstate cancer is the most frequent cancer in men and radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) is one of the first-line treatment. However, RRP has some side effects and can lead to chronic perineal pain. The objective of the study was to determine in patients suffering from perineal pain after RRP the possibility of a neurogenic damage by means of a specific questionnaire dedicated to track down neuropathic pain.
methodsForty patients were explored by a specific and validated questionnaire, the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). Patients were divided into two groups: Group A with an NSPI score ≥4 was considered as suffering from neuropathic pain, and Group B was considered as a control group without neuropathic pain (NSPI score <4). All patients had a perineal electrophysiological testing to confirm the possibility of a neurogenic damage.
resultsGroup A was composed by 13 men and Group B by 27 men, with mean age 72.45 years and mean duration of pain 2.7 years. In Group A, the most frequent symptoms were burning sensation, electrical shock and numbness. Location of the pain was global perineal area (8/13), anus (10/13), penis (5/13) and glans penis (2/13). Electromyography (EMG) findings confirmed the presence of denervation and neurogenic damages compared with controls (
conclusionOne third of the patients consulting for chronic pain following RRP had probably a neuropathic lesion leading to a chronic perineal pain as suggested by an NSPI score ≥ 4 and EMG alterations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.