ArticlePeerJ2019
New sources of
Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of PsLykX gene of pea (Pisum sativum L.) leads to loss of symbiotic nodules.Transgenic research · 2026Article
- The Genomic and Phenotypic Characterization of thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Signaling in Legume-Rhizobia Symbiosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- The Role of GmSnRK1-GmNodH Module in Regulating Soybean Nodulation Capacity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Nod factor perception: an integrative view of molecular communication during legume symbiosis.Plant molecular biology · 2022Review
- Identification and Expression Analysis of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Dynamics of Reactive Carbonyl Species in Pea Root Nodules in Response to Polyethylene Glycol (PEG)-Induced Osmotic Stress.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- A variable gene family encoding nodule-specific cysteine-rich peptides in pea (Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Varietas Delectat: Exploring Natural Variations in Nitrogen-Fixing Symbiosis Research.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Towards Understanding Afghanistan Pea Symbiotic Phenotype Through the Molecular Modeling of the Interaction Between LykX-Sym10 Receptor Heterodimer and Nod Factors.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Symbiotic Regulatory Genes Controlling Nodule Development inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
At the onset of legume-rhizobial symbiosis, the mutual recognition of partners occurs based on a complicated interaction between signal molecules and receptors. Bacterial signal molecules named Nod factors ("nodulation factors") are perceived by the plant LysM-containing receptor-like kinases (LysM-RLKs) that recognize details of its structure (i.e., unique substitutions), thus providing the conditions particular to symbiosis. In the garden pea (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.