ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2019
Study protocol: design and rationale for an exploratory phase II randomized controlled trial to determine optimal vitamin D
Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Vitamin DJBMR plus · 2023Trial
- The Effect of Bolus Vitamin DJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2021Trial
- Efficacy of biomarkers in the endochondral phase of fracture repair and healing in long bones: A clinical observational studys.PLoS medicine · 2025Observational
- Bone turnover markers as surrogates of fracture healing after intramedullary fixation of tibia and femur fractures.Bone & joint research · 2022Article
- Fixation Using Alternative Implants for the Treatment of Hip Fractures: The feasibility of a multicenter 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial evaluating surgical treatment and vitamin D supplementation in young femoral neck fracture patients.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObservational studies have found that 75% of healthy adult fracture patients (ages 18-50) have serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels < 30 ng/mL. Although lower serum 25(OH)D levels have yet to be correlated to fracture healing complications or poor fracture outcomes, many orthopedic surgeons are routinely prescribing vitamin D supplements to improve fracture healing in healthy non-osteoporotic patients. To address this gap in the literature, we propose a phase II exploratory randomized controlled trial comparing three vitamin D
methodsWe will conduct a 4-arm blinded exploratory phase II trial in 96 adults aged 18-50 years with a closed or low-grade open (Gustilo type I or II) tibial or femoral shaft fracture. Eligible patients will be randomized in equal allocation ratio of 1:1:1:1 to one of the treatment groups: (1) 150,000 IU loading dose vitamin D DISCUSSION: Study results will be disseminated through a publication in an academic journal and presentations at orthopedic conferences. Study results will inform dose selection for a large definitive randomized controlled trial and provide preliminary clinical data on which dose may improve acute fracture healing outcomes in healthy adult patients (18-50 years) at 3 months.
trial registrationVita-Shock (A Blinded Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial to Determine Optimal Vitamin D
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.