ArticlePharmacology research & perspectives2019
Systematic exploration of predicted destabilizing nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs) of human aldehyde oxidase: A Bio-informatics study.
Article in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- LINC01234 Sponging of the miR-513a-5p/AOX1 Axis is Upregulated in Osteoporosis and Regulates Osteogenic Differentiation of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells.Molecular biotechnology · 2023Article
- Identification of PCSK9-like human gene knockouts using metabolomics, proteomics, and whole-genome sequencing in a consanguineous population.Cell genomics · 2023Article
- Identification of deleterious single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)s in the humanBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2021Article
- Systematic exploration of predicted destabilizing nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs) of human aldehyde oxidase: A Bio-informatics study.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aldehyde Oxidase (hAOX1) is a cytosolic enzyme involved in the metabolism of drugs and xenobiotic compounds. The enzyme belongs to the xanthine oxidase (XO) family of Mo containing enzyme and is a homo-dimer of two 150 kDa monomers. Nonsynonymous Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (nsSNPs) of hAOX1 have been reported as affecting the ability of the enzyme to metabolize different substrates. Some of these nsSNPs have been biochemically and structurally characterized but the lack of a systematic and comprehensive study regarding all described and validated nsSNPs is urgent, due to the increasing importance of the enzyme in drug development, personalized medicine and therapy, as well as in pharmacogenetic studies. The objective of the present work was to collect all described nsSNPs of hAOX1 and utilize a series of bioinformatics tools to predict their effect on protein structure stability with putative implications on phenotypic functional consequences. Of 526 nsSNPs reported in NCBI-dbSNP, 119 are identified as deleterious whereas 92 are identified as nondeleterious variants. The stability analysis was performed for 119 deleterious variants and the results suggest that 104 nsSNPs may be responsible for destabilizing the protein structure, whereas five variants may increase the protein stability. Four nsSNPs do not have any impact on protein structure (neutral nsSNPs) of hAOX1. The prediction results of the remaining six nsSNPs are nonconclusive. The in silico results were compared with available experimental data. This methodology can also be used to identify and prioritize the stabilizing and destabilizing variants in other enzymes involved in drug metabolism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.