ReviewPharmacology research & perspectives2019
Pharmacological plasticity-How do you hit a moving target?
Review in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inter-organ crosstalk in systemic inflammation: a narrative review of molecular mechanisms and pharmacological modulation in the muscle-adipose-liver axis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Network analyses reveal new insights into the effect of multicomponent Tr14 compared to single-component diclofenac in an acute inflammation model.Journal of inflammation (London, England) · 2023Article
- Factors Determining Plasticity of Responses to Drugs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- The Impact of Diet and Exercise on Drug Responses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Drugs and Epigenetic Molecular Functions. A Pharmacological Data Scientometric Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Improving target assessment in biomedical research: the GOT-IT recommendations.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2021Review
- Pharmacological plasticity-How do you hit a moving target?Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Paul Ehrlich's concept of the magic bullet, by which a
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.