ArticleReviews in urology2019
Prostate Cancer Screening and Management in Solid Organ Transplant Candidates and Recipients.
Article in Reviews in urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Risk of de novo prostate cancer diagnosis after solid organ transplant: A retrospective claims-based matched cohort study.Urologic oncology · 2025Article
- Spectrum of cancer risk in Asian American and Pacific Islander solid organ transplant recipients.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025Article
- Prostate cancer and solid organ transplantation: patient management and outcomes.BJU international · 2025Article
- Genitourinary tumors and liver transplantation: A comprehensive review.World journal of transplantation · 2024Review
- Transrectal Prostate Biopsy Approach in Men Undergoing Kidney Transplant: A Retrospective Cohort Study at Three Referral Academic Centers.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A practical approach to extrahepatic cancer screening before and after liver transplant.Clinical liver disease · 2023Review
- Urological Cancers and Kidney Transplantation: a Literature Review.Current urology reports · 2021Review
- Article
- Prostate Cancer Characteristics in Renal Transplant Recipients: A 25-Year Experience From a Single Centre.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Article
- Clinical Course of Candidate Renal Transplant Recipients Diagnosed With Prostate Cancer During Pre-transplant Screening Test.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The number of solid organ transplantations is increasing worldwide. Major medical advances have allowed for incremented survival in this population, which, because approximately 50% of recipients are over age 50 years, makes for an increasingly older population of transplant survivors. This article discusses controversies and current guidelines related to prostate cancer (PCa) screening, detection, and treatment for men in the general population. The relevant literature is reviewed in order to provide insights on how to optimize PCa screening, detection, and treatment pre- and post-solid organ transplantation. There is compelling evidence that immunosuppression does not increase the risk for the development or progression of PCa following solid organ transplantation. Therefore, PCa screening, detection, or treatment should not be influenced by the impact of immunosuppression on the biology of the disease. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) appears to be as reliable for PCa screening of transplant candidates and recipients as it is for the general population. There is no consensus on how or when it should be implemented. Evidence is also equivocal as to the suggested waiting time between treatment and transplantation. Surgery and radiation therapy appear to be safe and provide good outcomes for managing PCa in solid organ transplant candidates and recipients. However, certain precautions should be taken with this vulnerable population, especially for kidney transplant patients given the pelvic location of the renal graft. Partial gland ablation of PCa should be considered in appropriate candidates.
Identifiers
31768135PMC6864909W2997452408What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.