Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31768074›Full record

ArticleHealth education journal2020

US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's

Dana Waltzman, Rosanne Hoffman, Zoe Donnell, Elizabeth Bell, Kelly Sarmiento

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health education journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dana WaltzmanCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention.
Rosanne HoffmanICF International, Strategic Communications & Marketing Division, USA.
Zoe DonnellICF International, Strategic Communications & Marketing Division, USA.
Elizabeth BellICF International, Strategic Communications & Marketing Division, USA.
Kelly SarmientoCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: For 15 years, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Objective: To keep pace with the rapid expansion in media coverage, research, state laws and education efforts on concussion, the CDC embarked on a comprehensive evaluation effort to assess the campaign's brand. Method: The CDC conducted a multi-step process to evaluate Results: The analysis demonstrated that most (70%) partner organisations have used the materials for 4 years or longer and more than half (51%) found the materials very useful or extremely useful. Focus groups with the campaign's target audiences yielded insights and opportunities to refresh the CDC Conclusion: This paper describes the process used to update the branding of an educational health promotion campaign in order to meet the needs of key audiences. Findings can help others working to keep their educational campaigns relevant and aligned with an expanding and changing public health problems.

Indexed as

brandsconcussion educationHEADS UPhealth communication campaignpublic health

Identifiers

PMID31768074
PMCPMC6876128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.