ArticleNature genetics2020
Returning incidental findings in African genomics research.
Article in Nature genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Clinical and Genetic Predictors of Sickle Cell Nephropathy: A Global Systematic Review.Omics : a journal of integrative biology · 2025Pooled it
- Guideline for feedback of individual genetic research findings for genomics research in Africa.BMJ global health · 2022Guideline
- Systematic Review of the Economic Evaluation of Returning Incidental Findings in Genomic Research.Frontiers in public health · 2021Pooled it
- Research participants' perspectives regarding the feedback of secondary findings-A cohort from the DDD-Africa study, South Africa.Journal of genetic counseling · 2024Article
- Parental perspectives regarding the return of genomic research results in neurodevelopmental disorders in South Africa: anticipated impact and preferences.Journal of community genetics · 2024Article
- Parental Perspectives Regarding the Return of Genomic Research Results in Neurodevelopmental Disorders in South Africa: Anticipated Impact and Preferences.Research square · 2024Article
- Perspectives of researchers, science policy makers and research ethics committee members on the feedback of individual genetic research findings in African genomics research.BMC medical ethics · 2024Article
- Ethical considerations for biobanking and use of genomics data in Africa: a narrative review.BMC medical ethics · 2023Review
- Clinically actionable secondary findings in 130 triads from sub-Saharan African families with non-syndromic orofacial clefts.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2023Article
- Feeding back of individual genetic results in Botswana: mapping opportunities and challenges.BMC medical ethics · 2023Article
- Participant views on practical considerations for feedback of individual genetic research results: a case study from Botswana.Global bioethics = Problemi di bioetica · 2023Article
- Including diverse and admixed populations in genetic epidemiology research.Genetic epidemiology · 2022Article
- Importance of Including Non-European Populations in Large Human Genetic Studies to Enhance Precision Medicine.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2022Review
- Exome sequencing of families from Ghana reveals known and candidate hearing impairment genes.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Whole Exome Sequencing in South Africa: Stakeholder Views on Return of Individual Research Results and Incidental Findings.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Perspectives and experiences of researchers regarding feedback of incidental genomic research findings: A qualitative study.PloS one · 2022Article
- Epistemic justice, African values and feedback of findings in African genomics research.Global bioethics = Problemi di bioetica · 2022Article
- Feedback of individual genetic and genomics research results: A qualitative study involving grassroots communities in Uganda.PloS one · 2022Article
- Considerations of Autonomy in Guiding Decisions around the Feedback of Individual Genetic Research Results from Genomics Research: Expectations of and Preferences from Researchers in Botswana.Global health, epidemiology and genomics · 2022Article
- Explanatory models for the cause of Fragile X Syndrome in rural Cameroon.Journal of genetic counseling · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.