Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31768062›Full record

ArticleNature methods2020

Isolating live cells after high-throughput, long-term, time-lapse microscopy.

Scott Luro, Laurent Potvin-Trottier, Burak Okumus, Johan Paulsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Fast, StreamlinedChemical & biomedical imaging · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. LFC-Lab on a chip · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. TrackRefiner a tool for refinement of bacillus cell tracking data.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Single-Cell Microfluidics: A Primer for Microbiologists.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Scott LuroDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. spl53@cornell.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8610-6978
Laurent Potvin-TrottierDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7876-2820
Burak OkumusDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Johan PaulssonDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. johan_paulsson@hms.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8671-4914

Funding

Limits and Trade-offs of Feedback ControlR01GM081563 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI Johan Paulsson · 2008 to 2026
$4.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081563
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell genetic screens can be incredibly powerful, but current high-throughput platforms do not track dynamic processes, and even for non-dynamic properties they struggle to separate mutants of interest from phenotypic outliers of the wild-type population. Here we introduce SIFT, single-cell isolation following time-lapse imaging, to address these limitations. After imaging and tracking individual bacteria for tens of consecutive generations under tightly controlled growth conditions, cells of interest are isolated and propagated for downstream analysis, free of contamination and without genetic or physiological perturbations. This platform can characterize tens of thousands of cell lineages per day, making it possible to accurately screen complex phenotypes without the need for barcoding or genetic modifications. We applied SIFT to identify a set of ultraprecise synthetic gene oscillators, with circuit variants spanning a 30-fold range of average periods. This revealed novel design principles in synthetic biology and demonstrated the power of SIFT to reliably screen diverse dynamic phenotypes.

Indexed as

Cell SeparationCell TrackingEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGene LibraryGenes, SyntheticHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMicrofluidicsSingle-Cell AnalysisTime-Lapse ImagingEscherichia coli Proteins

Identifiers

PMID31768062
PMCPMC7525750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.