Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31768054›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2019

Affective memory rehearsal with temporal sequences in amygdala neurons.

Tamar Reitich-Stolero, Rony Paz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Hippocampus and amygdala fear memory engrams re-emerge after contextual fear relapse.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Neuronal Sequence Models for Bayesian Online Inference.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2021
    Review
  9. Multidimensional processing in the amygdala.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  10. Pavlovian patterns in the amygdala.Nature neuroscience · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tamar Reitich-StoleroDepartment of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6549-6444
Rony PazDepartment of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. rony.paz@weizmann.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8868-216X
Weizmann Institute of Science · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Affective learning and memory are essential for daily behavior, with both adaptive and maladaptive learning depending on stimulus-evoked activity in the amygdala circuitry. Behavioral studies further suggest that post-association offline processing contributes to memory formation. Here we investigated spike sequences across simultaneously recorded neurons while monkeys learned to discriminate between aversive and pleasant tone-odor associations. We show that triplets of neurons exhibit consistent temporal sequences of spiking activity that differed from firing patterns of individual neurons and pairwise correlations. These sequences occurred throughout the long post-trial period, contained valence-related information, declined as learning progressed and were selectively present in activity evoked by the recent pairing of a conditioned stimulus with an unconditioned stimulus. Our findings reveal that temporal sequences across neurons in the primate amygdala serve as a coding mechanism and might aid memory formation through the rehearsal of the recently experienced association.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAmygdalaAnimalsConditioning, ClassicalDiscrimination LearningMacaca fascicularisMemoryNeuronsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID31768054
OpenAlexW2991232181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.