Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31767998›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2020

Chromosome organization in bacteria: mechanistic insights into genome structure and function.

Remus T Dame, Fatema-Zahra M Rashid, David C Grainger

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 142 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
142citing papers in PubMed
20.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

142 citing papers in PubMed, 256 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

82 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Remus T DameLeiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands. rtdame@chem.leidenuniv.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9863-1692
Fatema-Zahra M RashidLeiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2023-9046
David C GraingerInstitute of Microbiology and Infection, School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. d.grainger@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3375-5154
Leiden University · NLUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H010289/1Wellcome Trust 212193/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial chromosomes are folded to compact DNA and facilitate cellular processes. Studying model bacteria has revealed aspects of chromosome folding that are applicable to many species. Primarily controlled by nucleoid-associated proteins, chromosome folding is hierarchical, from large-scale macrodomains to smaller-scale structures that influence DNA transactions, including replication and transcription. Here we review the environmentally regulated, architectural and regulatory roles of nucleoid-associated proteins and the implications for bacterial cell biology. We also highlight similarities and differences in the chromosome folding mechanisms of bacteria and eukaryotes.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, BacterialDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGenome, BacterialDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID31767998
OpenAlexW2990771302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.