Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31767974›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of obesity (2005)2020

Long working hours and change in body weight: analysis of individual-participant data from 19 cohort studies.

Marianna Virtanen, Markus Jokela, Tea Lallukka, Linda Magnusson Hanson, Jaana Pentti, Solja T Nyberg, Lars Alfredsson, G David Batty, Annalisa Casini, Els Clays and 21 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of obesity (2005), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Marianna VirtanenSchool of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland. marianna.virtanen@uef.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8361-3301
Markus JokelaDepartment of Psychology and Logopedics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Tea LallukkaFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Linda Magnusson HansonStress Research Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jaana PenttiDepartment of Public Health, Clinicum, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Solja T NybergDepartment of Public Health, Clinicum, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Lars AlfredssonInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
G David BattyDepartment of Epidemiology & Public Health, University College London, London, UK.
Annalisa CasiniIPSY, Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Louvain-la-Neuve & School of Public Health, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Els ClaysDepartment of Public Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Dirk DeBacquerDepartment of Public Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Jenni ErvastiFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9113-2428
Eleonor FranssonStress Research Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jaana I HalonenStress Research Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jenny HeadDepartment of Epidemiology & Public Health, University College London, London, UK.
France KittelIPSY, Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Louvain-la-Neuve & School of Public Health, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Anders KnutssonDepartment of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden.
Constanze LeineweberStress Research Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Maria NordinDepartment of Psychology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Tuula OksanenFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Olli PietiläinenDepartment of Public Health, Clinicum, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Ossi RahkonenDepartment of Public Health, Clinicum, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Paula SaloFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Archana Singh-ManouxDepartment of Epidemiology & Public Health, University College London, London, UK.
Sari StenholmDepartment of Public Health, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7560-0930
Sakari B SuominenDepartment of Public Health, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Töres TheorellStress Research Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jussi VahteraDepartment of Public Health, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6036-061X
Peter WesterholmOccupational and Environmental Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Hugo WesterlundStress Research Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mika KivimäkiDepartment of Public Health, Clinicum, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R024227/1Medical Research Council MR/S011676/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the relation between long working hours and change in body mass index (BMI).

methodsWe performed random effects meta-analyses using individual-participant data from 19 cohort studies from Europe, US and Australia (n = 122,078), with a mean of 4.4-year follow-up. Working hours were measured at baseline and categorised as part time (<35 h/week), standard weekly hours (35-40 h, reference), 41-48 h, 49-54 h and ≥55 h/week (long working hours). There were four outcomes at follow-up: (1) overweight/obesity (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m

resultsOf the 61,143 participants without overweight/obesity at baseline, 20.2% had overweight/obesity at follow-up. Compared with standard weekly working hours, the age-, sex- and socioeconomic status-adjusted relative risk (RR) of overweight/obesity was 0.95 (95% CI 0.90-1.00) for part-time work, 1.07 (1.02-1.12) for 41-48 weekly working hours, 1.09 (1.03-1.16) for 49-54 h and 1.17 (1.08-1.27) for long working hours (P for trend <0.0001). The findings were similar after multivariable adjustment and in subgroup analyses. Long working hours were associated with an excess risk of shift from normal weight to overweight rather than from overweight to obesity. Long working hours were not associated with weight loss among participants with obesity.

conclusionsThis analysis of large individual-participant data suggests a small excess risk of overweight among the healthy-weight people who work long hours.

Indexed as

Body WeightWorkloadAustraliaCohort StudiesEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityOverweightUnited States

Identifiers

PMID31767974
PMCPMC7260128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.