Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31767945›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Blood transcriptome analysis in a buck-ewe hybrid and its parents.

Clemens Falker-Gieske, Christoph Knorr, Jens Tetens

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Clemens Falker-GieskeDepartment of Animal Sciences, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany. clemens.falker-gieske@uni-goettingen.de.
Christoph Knorr
Jens TetensDepartment of Animal Sciences, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5352-464X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Examples of living sheep-goat hybrids are rare, mainly due to incorrect chromosome pairing, which is thought to be the main cause for species incompatibility. This case represents the first report of a buck-ewe hybrid and the first mammalian hybrid to be analyzed with next generation sequencing. The buck-ewe hybrid had an intermediate karyotype to the parental species, with 57 chromosomes. Analysis of the blood transcriptomes of the hybrid and both parents revealed that gene expression levels differed between the hybrid and its parents. This could be explained in part by age-dependent differences in gene expression. Contribution to the geep transcriptome was larger from the paternal, compared to the maternal, genome. Furthermore, imprinting patterns deviated considerably from what is known from other mammals. Potentially deleterious variants appeared to be compensated for by monoallelic expression of transcripts. Hence, the data imply that the buck-ewe hybrid compensated for the phylogenetic distance between the parental species by several mechanisms: adjustment of gene expression levels, adaptation to imprinting incompatibilities, and selective monoallelic expression of advantageous transcripts. This study offers a unique opportunity to gain insights into the transcriptome biology and regulation of a hybrid mammal.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksAnimalsChimeraFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationGenomic ImprintingGoatsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingKaryotypeMalePaternal InheritanceSequence Analysis, RNASheep

Identifiers

PMID31767945
PMCPMC6877586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.