ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2020
Capturing Stem Cell Behavior Using Intravital and Live Cell Microscopy.
Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Imaging Approaches in Cancer Biology.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2024Review
- Fluorescence Microscopy-An Outline of Hardware, Biological Handling, and Fluorophore Considerations.Cells · 2021Review
- Multidimensional Imaging of Mammary Gland Development: A Window Into Breast Form and Function.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020Review
- Cancer Stem Cell Plasticity - A Deadly Deal.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2020Review
- Imaging-based tracking of stem-cell responses for 3D bioprinting optimization.Cell transplantationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stem cells maintain tissue homeostasis by driving cellular turnover and regeneration upon damage. They reside within specialized niches that provide the signals required for stem cell maintenance. Stem cells have been identified in many tissues and cancer types, but their behavior within the niche and their reaction to microenvironmental signals were inferred from limited static observations. Recent advances in live imaging techniques, such as live cell imaging and intravital microscopy, have allowed the visualization of stem cell behavior and dynamics over time in their (near) native environment. Through these recent technological advances, it is now evident that stem cells are much more dynamic than previously anticipated, resulting in a model in which stemness is a state that can be gained or lost over time. In this review, we will highlight how live imaging and intravital microscopy have unraveled previously unanticipated stem cell dynamics and plasticity during development, homeostasis, regeneration, and tumor formation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.