Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31767646›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2020

Modeling Brain Disorders Using Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Krishna C Vadodaria, Jeffrey R Jones, Sara Linker, Fred H Gage

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Histone bivalency in CNS development.Genes & development · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Human-specific geneFrontiers in molecular medicine · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Krishna C VadodariaLaboratory of Genetics, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
Jeffrey R JonesLaboratory of Genetics, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
Sara LinkerLaboratory of Genetics, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
Fred H GageLaboratory of Genetics, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
Salk Institute for Biological Studies · US

Funding

Viral Vector Core (VVC)P30CA014195 · NCI · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI Reuben Shaw · 1985 to 2026
$82.8M
Role of CACNA1C - a shared risk gene in neuropsychiatric disordersU19MH106434 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GAGE, FRED H, SONG, HONGJUN · 2016 to 2020
$13.8M
Combinatorial Actions of Genetic Variants and Gender Bias of Alzherimer's DiseaseR01AG057706 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI GAGE, FRED H, GLASS, CHRISTOPHER K · 2017 to 2021
$8.1M
The Enhancer Code of AD-A Genetic ApproachR01AG056511 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI GLASS, CHRISTOPHER K, ROSENFELD, MICHAEL G · 2018 to 2022
$5.3M
3/3-Schizophrenia Genetics and Brain Somatic MosaicismU01MH106882 · NIMH · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI GAGE, FRED H · 2015 to 2019
$5.3M
Dynamics of activity-induced transcription in single dentate granule cellsR01MH114030 · NIMH · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI FRED H GAGE · 2017 to 2026
$3.8M
Assessing cellular aging in old and rejuvenated neurons from Alzheimer patientsR01AG056306 · NIA · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI GAGE, FRED H · 2017 to 2021
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014195NIA NIH HHS R01 AG056306NIA NIH HHS R01 AG056511NIA NIH HHS R01 AG057706NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH114030NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH106882NIMH NIH HHS U19 MH106434
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain disorders, from neurodegenerative to psychiatric disorders, are among the most challenging conditions to study because of the intricate nature of the human brain and the limitations of existing model systems in recapitulating all these intricacies. However, innovations in stem cell technologies now allow us to reprogram patient somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), which can then be differentiated to disease-relevant neural and glial cells. iPSCs are a valuable tool to model brain disorders, as they can be derived from patients with known symptom histories, genetics, and drug-response profiles. Here, we discuss the premise and validity of the iPSC-based in vitro model system and highlight key findings from the most commonly studied neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainBrain DiseasesCell DifferentiationCentral Nervous SystemChemistry, PharmaceuticalDrug DesignGenetic TechniquesHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsModels, BiologicalModels, NeurologicalNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeurogliaNeuronsPluripotent Stem Cells

Identifiers

PMID31767646
PMCPMC7263088
OpenAlexW2989707678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.