Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31767542›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2019

Integrative proteogenomic analyses of human tumours identifies ADNP as a novel oncogenic mediator of cell cycle progression in high-grade serous ovarian cancer with poor prognosis.

Kubra Karagoz, Gaurav A Mehta, Christen A Khella, Pooja Khanna, Michael L Gatza

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kubra KaragozRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States; Department of Radiation Oncology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, United States; Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick NJ, United States.
Gaurav A MehtaRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States; Department of Radiation Oncology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, United States; Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick NJ, United States.
Christen A KhellaRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States; Department of Radiation Oncology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, United States; Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick NJ, United States.
Pooja KhannaRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States; Department of Radiation Oncology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, United States; Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick NJ, United States.
Michael L GatzaRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States; Department of Radiation Oncology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, United States; Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick NJ, United States. Electronic address: Michael.gatza@cinj.rutgers.edu.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

A Pathway-based approach to investigate oncogenic mechanisms in ovarian cancerR00CA166228 · NCI · RBHS -CANCER INSTITUTE OF NEW JERSEY · PI GATZA, MICHAEL L · 2015 to 2017
$747k
NCI NIH HHS R00 CA166228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite toxic side effects and limited durable response, the current standard-of-care treatment for high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) remains platinum/taxane-based chemotherapy. Given that the overall prognosis has not improved drastically over the past several decades, there is a critical need to understand the underlying mechanisms that lead to tumour development and progression.

methodsWe utilized an integrative proteogenomic analysis of HGSOC tumours applying a poor prognosis gene expression signature (PPS) as a conceptual framework to analyse orthogonal genomic and proteomic data from the TCGA (n = 488) and CPTAC (n = 169) studies. Genes identified through in silico analyses were assessed in vitro studies to demonstrate their impact on proliferation and cell cycle progression.

findingsThese analyses identified DNA amplification and overexpression of the transcription factor ADNP (Activity Dependent Neuroprotector Homeobox) in poorly prognostic tumours. Validation studies confirmed the prognostic capacity of ADNP and suggested an oncogenic role for this protein given the association between ADNP expression and pro-proliferative signalling. In vitro studies confirmed ADNP as a novel and essential mediator of cell proliferation through dysregulation of cell cycle checkpoints.

interpretationWe identified ADNP as being amplified and overexpressed in poor prognosis HGSOC in silico analyses and demonstrated that ADNP is a novel and essential oncogene in HGSOC which mediates proliferation through dysregulation of cell cycle checkpoints in vitro.

fundingThe National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health, the V Foundation for Cancer Research and the New Jersey Commission for Cancer Research.

Indexed as

ProteogenomicsBiomarkers, TumorCell CycleCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationComputational BiologyCystadenocarcinoma, SerousFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHomeodomain ProteinsHumansNeoplasm GradingNerve Tissue ProteinsOvarian NeoplasmsPrognosisADNP protein, humanBiomarkers, TumorHomeodomain ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsADNPHGSOCHigh-grade serous ovarian cancerPoor prognostic markerProteogenomic

Identifiers

PMID31767542
PMCPMC6921307
OpenAlexW2990199696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.