Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31766730›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Insect Cecropins, Antimicrobial Peptides with Potential Therapeutic Applications.

Daniel Brady, Alessandro Grapputo, Ottavia Romoli, Federica Sandrelli

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 198 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Drug-resistantClinical microbiology reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Genome of venomous caterpillarProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Impact ofInsects · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Daniel BradyDepartment of Biology, University of Padova, via U. Bassi 58/B, 35131 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9086-917X
Alessandro GrapputoDepartment of Biology, University of Padova, via U. Bassi 58/B, 35131 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9255-4294
Ottavia RomoliDepartment of Biology, University of Padova, via U. Bassi 58/B, 35131 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7608-2650
Federica SandrelliDepartment of Biology, University of Padova, via U. Bassi 58/B, 35131 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5631-7467
University of Padua · IT

Funding

Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Padova e Rovigo Progetti di Eccellenza 2011/12H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions Cinchron (grant agreement 765937)Università degli Studi di Padova CPDA154301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The alarming escalation of infectious diseases resistant to conventional antibiotics requires urgent global actions, including the development of new therapeutics. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) represent potential alternatives in the treatment of multi-drug resistant (MDR) infections. Here, we focus on Cecropins (Cecs), a group of naturally occurring AMPs in insects, and on synthetic Cec-analogs. We describe their action mechanisms and antimicrobial activity against MDR bacteria and other pathogens. We report several data suggesting that Cec and Cec-analog peptides are promising antibacterial therapeutic candidates, including their low toxicity against mammalian cells, and anti-inflammatory activity. We highlight limitations linked to the use of peptides as therapeutics and discuss methods overcoming these constraints, particularly regarding the introduction of nanotechnologies. New formulations based on natural Cecs would allow the development of drugs active against Gram-negative bacteria, and those based on Cec-analogs would give rise to therapeutics effective against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens. Cecs and Cec-analogs might be also employed to coat biomaterials for medical devices as an approach to prevent biomaterial-associated infections. The cost of large-scale production is discussed in comparison with the economic and social burden resulting from the progressive diffusion of MDR infectious diseases.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial Cationic PeptidesDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsInsect ProteinsGram-Negative BacteriaHumansAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesInsect Proteinsantimicrobial peptidesCec-analogsCecropinsinsectsMDR infectious diseases

Identifiers

PMID31766730
PMCPMC6929098
OpenAlexW2991576191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.