Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31766703›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2019

Martina Jelocnik

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Current status and future directions ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Emergence Potential ofArchives of Razi Institute · 2024
    Review
  5. Draft genomes of novel avianMicrobial genomics · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. First Molecular Detection of ZoonoticPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Completing the Genome Sequence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martina JelocnikGenecology Research Centre, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs 4557, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1340-2562
University of the Sunshine Coast · AU

Funding

Australian Research Council DE190100238
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Australia, the most researched and perhaps the most successful chlamydial species are the human pathogen

Indexed as

Australiaavian infectionschlamydial infectionsChlamydia pecorumChlamydia psittaciChlamydia trachomatiskoalazoonoses

Identifiers

PMID31766703
PMCPMC6955670
OpenAlexW2991215851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.