Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31766548›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Exit and Entry Screening Practices for Infectious Diseases among Travelers at Points of Entry: Looking for Evidence on Public Health Impact.

Varvara A Mouchtouri, Eleni P Christoforidou, Maria An der Heiden, Cinthia Menel Lemos, Margherita Fanos, Ute Rexroth, Ulrike Grote, Evelien Belfroid, Corien Swaan, Christos Hadjichristodoulou

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The Latin American Integration Route and infectious diseases.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Varvara A MouchtouriDepartment of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41222 Larissa, Greece.
Eleni P ChristoforidouDepartment of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41222 Larissa, Greece.
Maria An der HeidenRobert Koch Institute, Department for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Cinthia Menel LemosConsumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency (Chafea), L-2920 Luxemburg, Luxemburg.
Margherita FanosEuropean Commission, DG Health and Food Safety (SANTE), Unit C3-Crisis Management and Preparedness in Health, Luxemburg, L-2920, Luxembourg.
Ute RexrothRobert Koch Institute, Department for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Ulrike GroteRobert Koch Institute, Department for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Evelien BelfroidNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, RIVM, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Corien SwaanNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, RIVM, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Christos HadjichristodoulouDepartment of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41222 Larissa, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A scoping search and a systematic literature review were conducted to give an insight on entry and exit screening referring to travelers at points of entry, by analyzing published evidence on practices, guidelines, and experiences in the past 15 years worldwide. Grey literature, PubMed. and Scopus were searched using specific terms. Most of the available data identified through the systematic literature review concerned entry screening measures at airports. Little evidence is available about entry and exit screening measure implementation and effectiveness at ports and ground crossings. Exit screening was part of the World Health Organisation's (WHO) temporary recommendations for implementation in certain points of entry, for specific time periods. Exit screening measures for Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) in the three most affected West African countries did not identify any cases and showed zero sensitivity and very low specificity. The percentages of confirmed cases identified out of the total numbers of travelers that passed through entry screening measures in various countries worldwide for Influenza Pandemic (H1N1) and EVD in West Africa were zero or extremely low. Entry screening measures for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) did not detect any confirmed SARS cases in Australia, Canada, and Singapore. Despite the ineffectiveness of entry and exit screening measures, authors reported several important concomitant positive effects that their impact is difficult to assess, including discouraging travel of ill persons, raising awareness, and educating the traveling public and maintaining operation of flights from/to the affected areas. Exit screening measures in affected areas are important and should be applied jointly with other measures including information strategies, epidemiological investigation, contact tracing, vaccination, and quarantine to achieve a comprehensive outbreak management response. Based on review results, an algorithm about decision-making for entry/exit screening was developed.

Indexed as

TravelAfrica, WesternAircraftCommunicable Disease ControlCommunicable DiseasesDisease OutbreaksHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaHumansInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanMass ScreeningPublic HealthSevere Acute Respiratory Syndromeairportborderground crossinghealth measureIHRPHEICpoints of entryportscreening

Identifiers

PMID31766548
PMCPMC6926871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.