ArticleCancers2019
Prospective Evaluation of the Concordance of Commercial Circulating Tumor DNA Alterations with Tumor-Based Sequencing across Multiple Soft Tissue Sarcoma Subtypes.
Article in Cancers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Precision medicine in diagnosis, prognosis, and disease monitoring of bone and soft tissue sarcomas using liquid biopsy: a systematic review.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Signals Alongside Scans: A Genomics-Guided Framework for Liquid Biopsy in Bone and Soft-Tissue Sarcomas.Cells · 2026Review
- Blood-based biomarkers in soft tissue sarcoma: Implications for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.International journal of cancer · 2025Review
- Extracellular Vesicle- MDM2 -DNA as a Potential Liquid Biopsy Biomarker for Disease Identification in Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma.Annals of surgery · 2025Article
- Review
- Can a Liquid Biopsy Detect Circulating Tumor DNA With Low-passage Whole-genome Sequencing in Patients With a Sarcoma? A Pilot Evaluation.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2025Article
- Circulating Tumor DNA in the Monitoring of Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment and Recurrence.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Liquid Biopsy: A New Translational Diagnostic and Monitoring Tool for Musculoskeletal Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Liquid Biopsies in Sarcoma Clinical Practice: Where Do We Stand?Biomedicines · 2021Review
- Detection and utility of cell-free and circulating tumour DNA in bone and soft-tissue sarcomas.Bone & joint research · 2021Article
- Profiling Colorectal Cancer in the Landscape Personalized Testing-Advantages of Liquid Biopsy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- The Circulating Nucleic Acid Characteristics of Non-Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- The new horizon of liquid biopsy in sarcoma: the potential utility of circulating tumor nucleic acids.Journal of Cancer · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are diverse tumors with heterogenous alterations. Platforms to detect circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) have rapidly increased in popularity as they may avoid invasive biopsy morbidity. However, ctDNA profiling concordance with standard solid tumor comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is poorly characterized. Here, we report the outcomes of a single-institution experience comparing mutational results from commercial ctDNA and solid tumor CGP in advanced STS subjects. We identified STS subjects who had undergone solid tumor based CGP in four distinct cohorts: Dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS), leiomyosarcoma (LMS), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Subjects with radiographically measurable tumor were profiled using a commercial ctDNA CGP panel. Overlapping genes/exons on both biopsy panels were analyzed. Twenty-four subjects completed both ctDNA and solid tumor CGP. ctDNA was detected in 18/24 subjects. Subject level concordance rates in all overlapping genes were: LMS = 4/6; UPS = 2/6; DDLPS = 1/6; GIST = 0/6. Copy number alterations were notably poorly concordant. For subjects with short variant alterations and detectable tumor fractions, concordance with solid tumor CGP was 76% (13/17). LMS subjects had the highest median tumor fraction and concordance. No correlation was seen between tumor fraction or radiographic tumor volume largely driven by low estimated tumor fraction. A limitation of the study is that only targeted sequencing was performed. However, given the poor concordance in commonly altered genes, ctDNA panels in sarcoma cannot be broadly applied. Further, more extensive studies will need to be performed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.