Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31766272›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Method for Distinguishing Humans and Animals in Vital Signs Monitoring Using IR-UWB Radar.

Pengfei Wang, Yang Zhang, Yangyang Ma, Fulai Liang, Qiang An, Huijun Xue, Xiao Yu, Hao Lv, Jianqi Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Non-Contact Vital Signs Monitoring of Dog and Cat Using a UWB Radar.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pengfei WangDepartment of Medical Electronics, School of Biomedical Engineering, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6298-7478
Yang ZhangDepartment of Medical Electronics, School of Biomedical Engineering, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8540-1254
Yangyang MaDepartment of Medical Electronics, School of Biomedical Engineering, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0003-2726
Fulai LiangDepartment of Medical Electronics, School of Biomedical Engineering, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China.
Qiang AnDepartment of Medical Electronics, School of Biomedical Engineering, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China.
Huijun XueDepartment of Medical Electronics, School of Biomedical Engineering, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5598-2000
Xiao YuDepartment of Medical Electronics, School of Biomedical Engineering, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China.
Hao LvDepartment of Medical Electronics, School of Biomedical Engineering, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China.
Jianqi WangDepartment of Medical Electronics, School of Biomedical Engineering, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radar has been widely applied in many scenarios as a critical remote sensing tool for non-contact vital sign monitoring, particularly for sleep monitoring and heart rate measurement within the home environment. For non-contact monitoring with radar, interference from house pets is an important issue that has been neglected in the past. Many animals have respiratory frequencies similar to those of humans, and they are easily mistaken for human targets in non-contact monitoring, which would trigger a false alarm because of incorrect physiological parameters from the animal. In this study, humans and common pets in families, such as dogs, cats, and rabbits, were detected using an impulse radio ultrawideband (IR-UWB) radar, and the echo signals were analyzed in the time and frequency domains. Subsequently, based on the distinct in-body structure between humans and animals, we propose a parameter, the respiratory and heartbeat energy ratio (RHER), which reflects the contribution rate of breathing and heartbeat in the detected vital signs. Combining this parameter with the energy index, we developed a novel scheme to distinguish between humans and animals. In the developed scheme, after background noise removal and direct-current component suppression, an energy indicator is used to initially identify the target. The signal is then decomposed using a variational mode decomposition algorithm, and the variational intrinsic mode functions that represent human respiration and heartbeat components are obtained and utilized to calculate the RHER parameter. Finally, the RHER index is applied to rapidly distinguish between humans and animals. Our experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach more effectively distinguishes between humans and animals in terms of monitoring vital signs than the existing methods. Furthermore, its rapidity and need for only minimal calculation resources enable it to meet the needs of real-time monitoring.

Indexed as

RadarSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedVital SignsAlgorithmsAnimalsCatsDogsHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicRabbitshealth monitoringhuman and animalsradarrespiratory and heartbeat energy ratiovariational mode decomposition (VMD)vital signs

Identifiers

PMID31766272
PMCPMC6888617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.